All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel Walker (danielwa)" <danielwa@cisco.com>
To: "Shubham Pushpkar -X (spushpka - E INFOCHIPS PRIVATE LIMITED at
	Cisco)" <spushpka@cisco.com>
Cc: "xe-linux-external(mailer list)" <xe-linux-external@cisco.com>,
	Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [Internal Review] [Patch] btrfs: fix use-after-free of block device file in __btrfs_free_extra_devids()
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 13:08:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5I/YsJbzLaTBZ/9@goliath> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250123114141.1955806-1-spushpka@cisco.com>


Looks fine for release to me.


On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 03:41:41AM -0800, Shubham Pushpkar wrote:
> From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
> 
> commit aec8e6bf839101784f3ef037dcdb9432c3f32343 ("btrfs:
> fix use-after-free of block device file in __btrfs_free_extra_devids()")
> 
> Mounting btrfs from two images (which have the same one fsid and two
> different dev_uuids) in certain executing order may trigger an UAF for
> variable 'device->bdev_file' in __btrfs_free_extra_devids(). And
> following are the details:
> 
> 1. Attach image_1 to loop0, attach image_2 to loop1, and scan btrfs
>    devices by ioctl(BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV):
> 
>              /  btrfs_device_1 → loop0
>    fs_device
>              \  btrfs_device_2 → loop1
> 2. mount /dev/loop0 /mnt
>    btrfs_open_devices
>     btrfs_device_1->bdev_file = btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(loop0)
>     btrfs_device_2->bdev_file = btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(loop1)
>    btrfs_fill_super
>     open_ctree
>      fail: btrfs_close_devices // -ENOMEM
> 	    btrfs_close_bdev(btrfs_device_1)
>              fput(btrfs_device_1->bdev_file)
> 	      // btrfs_device_1->bdev_file is freed
> 	    btrfs_close_bdev(btrfs_device_2)
>              fput(btrfs_device_2->bdev_file)
> 
> 3. mount /dev/loop1 /mnt
>    btrfs_open_devices
>     btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(&bdev_file)
>      // EIO, btrfs_device_1->bdev_file is not assigned,
>      // which points to a freed memory area
>     btrfs_device_2->bdev_file = btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb(loop1)
>    btrfs_fill_super
>     open_ctree
>      btrfs_free_extra_devids
>       if (btrfs_device_1->bdev_file)
>        fput(btrfs_device_1->bdev_file) // UAF !
> 
> Fix it by setting 'device->bdev_file' as 'NULL' after closing the
> btrfs_device in btrfs_close_one_device().
> 
> Fixes: CVE-2024-50217
> Fixes: 142388194191 ("btrfs: do not background blkdev_put()")
> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=219408
> Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
> (cherry picked from commit aec8e6bf839101784f3ef037dcdb9432c3f32343)
> Signed-off-by: Shubham Pushpkar <spushpka@cisco.com>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index b9a0b26d08e1..ab2412542ce5 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -1176,6 +1176,7 @@ static void btrfs_close_one_device(struct btrfs_device *device)
>  	if (device->bdev) {
>  		fs_devices->open_devices--;
>  		device->bdev = NULL;
> +		device->bdev_file = NULL;
>  	}
>  	clear_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_WRITEABLE, &device->dev_state);
>  	btrfs_destroy_dev_zone_info(device);
> -- 
> 2.35.6
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-23 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-23 11:41 [Internal Review] [Patch] btrfs: fix use-after-free of block device file in __btrfs_free_extra_devids() Shubham Pushpkar
2025-01-23 13:08 ` Daniel Walker (danielwa) [this message]
2025-01-23 13:56   ` Greg KH
2025-01-23 14:20     ` Daniel Walker (danielwa)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z5I/YsJbzLaTBZ/9@goliath \
    --to=danielwa@cisco.com \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=spushpka@cisco.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xe-linux-external@cisco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.