From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] iomap: refactor iter and advance continuation logic
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 21:34:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5hsV876-PW46WsA@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250122133434.535192-4-bfoster@redhat.com>
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 08:34:30AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> + s64 ret;
> + bool stale = iter->iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_STALE;
Nit: I find code more redable if variables that initialized at
declaration time (especially when derived from arguments) are
before plain variable declarations. Not a big thing here with just
two of them, but variable counts keep growing over time.
>
> - if (iter->iomap.length && ops->iomap_end) {
> + if (!iter->iomap.length) {
> + trace_iomap_iter(iter, ops, _RET_IP_);
> + goto begin;
> + }
This might be a chance to split trace_iomap_iter into two trace points
for the initial and following iterations? Or maybe we shouldn't bother.
Otherwise this looks great:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-28 5:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-22 13:34 [PATCH v2 0/7] iomap: incremental per-operation iter advance Brian Foster
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] iomap: split out iomap check and reset logic from " Brian Foster
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] iomap: factor out iomap length helper Brian Foster
2025-01-28 5:26 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 13:53 ` Brian Foster
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] iomap: refactor iter and advance continuation logic Brian Foster
2025-01-28 5:34 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-01-28 13:55 ` Brian Foster
2025-01-29 5:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] iomap: support incremental iomap_iter advances Brian Foster
2025-01-28 5:35 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] iomap: advance the iter directly on buffered writes Brian Foster
2025-01-28 5:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] iomap: advance the iter directly on unshare range Brian Foster
2025-01-28 5:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 13:57 ` Brian Foster
2025-01-29 5:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-28 17:59 ` Brian Foster
2025-01-29 5:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-29 16:40 ` Brian Foster
2025-01-22 13:34 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] iomap: advance the iter directly on zero range Brian Foster
2025-01-28 5:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z5hsV876-PW46WsA@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.