Re: [meta-arm] [PATCH] systemd-boot: update systemd-bootaarch64.efi path

[Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@linaro.org>]

Hi,

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 09:03:59AM +0200, Mikko Rapeli via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 03:33:28PM +0000, Jon Mason wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 7:24 AM Mikko Rapeli via
> > lists.yoctoproject.org
> > <mikko.rapeli=linaro.org@lists.yoctoproject.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > poky updated systemd from 256 to 257 which changed
> > > the build time path.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@linaro.org>
> > 
> > I tried this out a couple weeks ago.
> > https://gitlab.com/jonmason00/meta-arm/-/jobs/8885513336
> > Essentially, systemd changed more than just the location.  It changed
> > UKI fairly significantly, and that is failing to generate an
> > authenticated image.
> > I was able to bisect it to the systemd commit
> > https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/2188c759f97e40b97ebe3e94e82239f36b525b10
> > 
> > I ran out of time to bug this further, and meant to email you with the above.
> > 
> > I'm hesitant to apply a patch that doesn't fully resolve the issue
> > (though Ross might have a different opinion).  So, if you can manage
> > to fix the systemd UKI issue, I'd be willing to take it then.
> 
> Ok I will have a look. oe-core has pretty good selftests for uki.bbclass and
> systemd-boot so I would have expected them to catch major regressions, apart
> from secureboot which is the addition to them in meta-arm.

FYI: discussion and analysis is happening in upstream systemd bugreport
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/35851

Cheers,

-Mikko