From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/dp: Use int for compressed BPP in dsc_compute_link_config()
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 17:08:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z5zncd8R16GC1Lvf@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8f9aebc4e40afeed3d723f98cae96c9c927a480.1738327620.git.jani.nikula@intel.com>
On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 02:50:04PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> Just use ints unless there are actual reasons to do otherwise. Here,
> there are not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 7a8a4df1bf1e..7c6d277729d0 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1926,7 +1926,7 @@ static bool intel_dp_dsc_supports_format(const struct intel_connector *connector
> return drm_dp_dsc_sink_supports_format(connector->dp.dsc_dpcd, sink_dsc_format);
> }
>
> -static bool is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config(u16 compressed_bppx16, u32 link_clock,
> +static bool is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config(int dsc_bpp_x16, u32 link_clock,
> u32 lane_count, u32 mode_clock,
> enum intel_output_format output_format,
> int timeslots)
> @@ -1934,7 +1934,7 @@ static bool is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config(u16 compressed_bppx16, u32 link_cloc
> u32 available_bw, required_bw;
>
> available_bw = (link_clock * lane_count * timeslots * 16) / 8;
> - required_bw = compressed_bppx16 * (intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock));
> + required_bw = dsc_bpp_x16 * (intel_dp_mode_to_fec_clock(mode_clock));
This reduces the range for dsc_bpp_x16 and mode_clock where the above
multiply won't overflow, but afaics with the current max values of those
this is still ok:
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
>
> return available_bw > required_bw;
> }
> @@ -1942,7 +1942,7 @@ static bool is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config(u16 compressed_bppx16, u32 link_cloc
> static int dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> const struct link_config_limits *limits,
> - u16 compressed_bppx16,
> + int dsc_bpp_x16,
> int timeslots)
> {
> const struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode = &pipe_config->hw.adjusted_mode;
> @@ -1957,7 +1957,7 @@ static int dsc_compute_link_config(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
> for (lane_count = limits->min_lane_count;
> lane_count <= limits->max_lane_count;
> lane_count <<= 1) {
> - if (!is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config(compressed_bppx16, link_rate,
> + if (!is_bw_sufficient_for_dsc_config(dsc_bpp_x16, link_rate,
> lane_count, adjusted_mode->clock,
> pipe_config->output_format,
> timeslots))
> --
> 2.39.5
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-31 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-31 12:49 [PATCH 00/14] drm/i915/dp: dsc fix, refactoring and cleanups Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 12:49 ` [PATCH 01/14] drm/i915/dp: Iterate DSC BPP from high to low on all platforms Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 13:32 ` Imre Deak
2025-02-03 14:46 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 16:13 ` Nautiyal, Ankit K
2025-01-31 12:49 ` [PATCH 02/14] drm/i915/dp: Add intel_dp_dsc_bpp_step_x16() helper to get DSC BPP precision Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 13:45 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 14:06 ` Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 23:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 12:49 ` [PATCH 03/14] drm/i915/dp: Rename some variables in xelpd_dsc_compute_link_config() Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 13:57 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:49 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/dp: Pass .4 BPP values to {icl, xelpd}_dsc_compute_link_config() Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 14:05 ` [PATCH 04/14] drm/i915/dp: Pass .4 BPP values to {icl,xelpd}_dsc_compute_link_config() Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:49 ` [PATCH 05/14] drm/i915/dp: Move max DSC BPP reduction one level higher Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 14:26 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:49 ` [PATCH 06/14] drm/i915/dp: Change icl_dsc_compute_link_config() DSC BPP iteration Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 14:30 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 07/14] drm/i915/dp: Move force_dsc_fractional_bpp_en check to intel_dp_dsc_valid_bpp() Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 14:32 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 08/14] drm/i915/dp: Unify DSC link config functions Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 14:35 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 09/14] drm/i915/dp: Inline do_dsc_compute_compressed_bpp() Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 14:48 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 10/14] drm/i915/dp: Simplify input BPP checks in intel_dp_dsc_compute_pipe_bpp() Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 14:52 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 11/14] drm/i915/dp: Use int for compressed BPP in dsc_compute_link_config() Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 15:08 ` Imre Deak [this message]
2025-01-31 15:27 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 12/14] drm/i915/dp: Drop compute_pipe_bpp parameter from intel_dp_dsc_compute_config() Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 15:10 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 13/14] drm/i915/dp: Pass connector state all the way to dsc_compute_link_config() Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 15:38 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:50 ` [PATCH 14/14] drm/i915/mst: Convert intel_dp_mtp_tu_compute_config() to .4 format Jani Nikula
2025-01-31 15:46 ` Imre Deak
2025-01-31 12:57 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for drm/i915/dp: dsc fix, refactoring and cleanups Patchwork
2025-01-31 12:57 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-31 12:58 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-01-31 13:13 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-31 13:13 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 13:15 ` ✓ CI.Build: success " Patchwork
2025-01-31 13:17 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 13:18 ` ✗ CI.checksparse: warning " Patchwork
2025-01-31 13:35 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-01-31 13:38 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-01-31 14:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: dsc fix, refactoring and cleanups (rev2) Patchwork
2025-01-31 14:53 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-01-31 15:09 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-01-31 17:34 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for drm/i915/dp: dsc fix, refactoring and cleanups Patchwork
2025-02-01 0:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/dp: dsc fix, refactoring and cleanups (rev3) Patchwork
2025-02-01 0:05 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-02-01 0:23 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2025-02-01 0:24 ` ✗ CI.Patch_applied: failure for drm/i915/dp: dsc fix, refactoring and cleanups (rev2) Patchwork
2025-02-01 7:22 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2025-02-01 12:41 ` ✗ i915.CI.Full: failure for drm/i915/dp: dsc fix, refactoring and cleanups (rev3) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z5zncd8R16GC1Lvf@ideak-desk.fi.intel.com \
--to=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.