From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.20?] x86/dom0: be less restrictive with the Interrupt Address Range
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 09:46:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z62xS26FBClpsol9@macbook.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250212153800.5159-1-roger.pau@citrix.com>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 04:38:00PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> Xen currently prevents dom0 from creating CPU or IOMMU page-table mappings
> into the interrupt address range [0xfee00000, 0xfeefffff]. This range has
> two different purposes. For accesses from the CPU is contains the default
> position of local APIC page at 0xfee00000. For accesses from devices
> it's the MSI address range, so the address field in the MSI entries
> (usually) point to an address on that range to trigger an interrupt.
>
> There are reports of Lenovo Thinkpad devices placing what seems to be the
> UCSI shared mailbox at address 0xfeec2000 in the interrupt address range.
> Attempting to use that device with a Linux PV dom0 leads to an error when
> Linux kernel maps 0xfeec2000:
>
> RIP: e030:xen_mc_flush+0x1e8/0x2b0
> xen_leave_lazy_mmu+0x15/0x60
> vmap_range_noflush+0x408/0x6f0
> __ioremap_caller+0x20d/0x350
> acpi_os_map_iomem+0x1a3/0x1c0
> acpi_ex_system_memory_space_handler+0x229/0x3f0
> acpi_ev_address_space_dispatch+0x17e/0x4c0
> acpi_ex_access_region+0x28a/0x510
> acpi_ex_field_datum_io+0x95/0x5c0
> acpi_ex_extract_from_field+0x36b/0x4e0
> acpi_ex_read_data_from_field+0xcb/0x430
> acpi_ex_resolve_node_to_value+0x2e0/0x530
> acpi_ex_resolve_to_value+0x1e7/0x550
> acpi_ds_evaluate_name_path+0x107/0x170
> acpi_ds_exec_end_op+0x392/0x860
> acpi_ps_parse_loop+0x268/0xa30
> acpi_ps_parse_aml+0x221/0x5e0
> acpi_ps_execute_method+0x171/0x3e0
> acpi_ns_evaluate+0x174/0x5d0
> acpi_evaluate_object+0x167/0x440
> acpi_evaluate_dsm+0xb6/0x130
> ucsi_acpi_dsm+0x53/0x80
> ucsi_acpi_read+0x2e/0x60
> ucsi_register+0x24/0xa0
> ucsi_acpi_probe+0x162/0x1e3
> platform_probe+0x48/0x90
> really_probe+0xde/0x340
> __driver_probe_device+0x78/0x110
> driver_probe_device+0x1f/0x90
> __driver_attach+0xd2/0x1c0
> bus_for_each_dev+0x77/0xc0
> bus_add_driver+0x112/0x1f0
> driver_register+0x72/0xd0
> do_one_initcall+0x48/0x300
> do_init_module+0x60/0x220
> __do_sys_init_module+0x17f/0x1b0
> do_syscall_64+0x82/0x170
>
> Remove the restrictions to create mappings the interrupt address range for
> dom0. Note that the restriction to map the local APIC page is enforced
> separately, and that continues to be present.
>
> For PVH dom0 it's important that the restriction is removed from
> arch_iommu_hwdom_init(), as the logic in that function creates mappings in
> both the CPU and the IOMMU page tables for reserved regions in the memory
> map. The expectation is that the page at 0xfeec2000 will be added to the
> host memory map using the EfiACPIMemoryNVS type, so arch_iommu_hwdom_init()
> will create a mapping for it.
>
> Note that even if the interrupt address range entries are populated in the
> IOMMU page-tables no device access will reach those pages. Device accesses
> to the Interrupt Address Range will always be converted into Interrupt
> Messages and are not subject to DMA remapping.
>
> There's also the following restriction noted in Intel VT-d:
>
> > Software must not program paging-structure entries to remap any address to
> > the interrupt address range. Untranslated requests and translation requests
> > that result in an address in the interrupt range will be blocked with
> > condition code LGN.4 or SGN.8. Translated requests with an address in the
> > interrupt address range are treated as Unsupported Request (UR).
>
> However this restriction doesn't apply to the identity mappings possibly
> created for dom0, since the interrupt address range is never subject to DMA
> remapping.
>
> Reported-by: Jürgen Groß <jgross@suse.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/baade0a7-e204-4743-bda1-282df74e5f89@suse.com/
> Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c | 4 ----
> xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c | 5 -----
> 2 files changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c b/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c
> index e8f5bf5447bc..d1b4ef83b2d0 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/dom0_build.c
> @@ -555,10 +555,6 @@ int __init dom0_setup_permissions(struct domain *d)
> if ( !rangeset_contains_singleton(mmio_ro_ranges, mfn) )
> rc |= iomem_deny_access(d, mfn, mfn);
> }
> - /* MSI range. */
> - rc |= iomem_deny_access(d, paddr_to_pfn(MSI_ADDR_BASE_LO),
> - paddr_to_pfn(MSI_ADDR_BASE_LO +
> - MSI_ADDR_DEST_ID_MASK));
> /* HyperTransport range. */
> if ( boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor & (X86_VENDOR_AMD | X86_VENDOR_HYGON) )
> {
> diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
> index 8b1e0596b84a..ec17701c90dd 100644
> --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
> @@ -475,11 +475,6 @@ void __hwdom_init arch_iommu_hwdom_init(struct domain *d)
> if ( rc )
> panic("IOMMU failed to remove Xen ranges: %d\n", rc);
>
> - /* Remove any overlap with the Interrupt Address Range. */
> - rc = rangeset_remove_range(map, 0xfee00, 0xfeeff);
> - if ( rc )
> - panic("IOMMU failed to remove Interrupt Address Range: %d\n", rc);
> -
This last chunk is not correct, if the interrupt address range is not
removed, the local APIC page needs to be filtered out, so this should
instead be:
diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
index 8b1e0596b84a..c53626dfc69d 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/iommu.c
@@ -475,10 +475,11 @@ void __hwdom_init arch_iommu_hwdom_init(struct domain *d)
if ( rc )
panic("IOMMU failed to remove Xen ranges: %d\n", rc);
- /* Remove any overlap with the Interrupt Address Range. */
- rc = rangeset_remove_range(map, 0xfee00, 0xfeeff);
+ /* Remove any overlap with the local APIC page. */
+ rc = rangeset_remove_range(map, paddr_to_pfn(mp_lapic_addr),
+ paddr_to_pfn(mp_lapic_addr));
if ( rc )
- panic("IOMMU failed to remove Interrupt Address Range: %d\n", rc);
+ panic("IOMMU failed to remove local APIC page: %d\n", rc);
/* If emulating IO-APIC(s) make sure the base address is unmapped. */
if ( has_vioapic(d) )
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-12 15:38 [PATCH for-4.20?] x86/dom0: be less restrictive with the Interrupt Address Range Roger Pau Monne
2025-02-13 8:46 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2025-02-13 9:06 ` Jan Beulich
2025-02-13 17:07 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-02-14 13:01 ` Jan Beulich
2025-02-14 13:57 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-02-17 8:49 ` Jan Beulich
2025-02-17 9:47 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-02-17 9:54 ` Jan Beulich
2025-02-17 8:52 ` Oleksii Kurochko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z62xS26FBClpsol9@macbook.local \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.