From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] dax: advance the iomap_iter in the read/write path
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 10:27:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z64PVpTOVhxfFPZm@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z62XUFHMtNkXJpDi@infradead.org>
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:55:12PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 08:57:06AM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > DAX reads and writes flow through dax_iomap_iter(), which has one or
> > more subtleties in terms of how it processes a range vs. what is
> > specified in the iomap_iter. To keep things simple and remove the
> > dependency on iomap_iter() advances, convert a positive return from
> > dax_iomap_iter() to the new advance and status return semantics. The
> > advance can be pushed further down in future patches.
>
> Looks good:
>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
>
> (and looking forward to the future patches..)
>
Thanks. The patch to push this down a level seems to be working now so
I'll include it in v2.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-12 13:57 [PATCH 00/10] iomap: incremental advance conversion -- phase 2 Brian Foster
2025-02-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 01/10] iomap: advance the iter directly on buffered read Brian Foster
2025-02-13 6:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-13 15:24 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 02/10] iomap: advance the iter on direct I/O Brian Foster
2025-02-13 6:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-13 15:25 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 03/10] iomap: convert misc simple ops to incremental advance Brian Foster
2025-02-13 6:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-13 15:26 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 04/10] dax: advance the iomap_iter in the read/write path Brian Foster
2025-02-13 6:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-13 15:27 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2025-02-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 05/10] dax: advance the iomap_iter on zero range Brian Foster
2025-02-13 6:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-13 15:27 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 06/10] dax: advance the iomap_iter on unshare range Brian Foster
2025-02-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 07/10] dax: advance the iomap_iter on dedupe range Brian Foster
2025-02-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 08/10] dax: advance the iomap_iter on pte and pmd faults Brian Foster
2025-02-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 09/10] iomap: remove unnecessary advance from iomap_iter() Brian Foster
2025-02-13 6:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-02-13 15:27 ` Brian Foster
2025-02-12 13:57 ` [PATCH 10/10] iomap: rename iomap_iter processed field to status Brian Foster
2025-02-13 7:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z64PVpTOVhxfFPZm@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.