From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
Cc: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
<katarzyna.piecielska@intel.com>, <jari.tahvanainen@intel.com>,
<ramadevi.gandi@intel.com>, <kamil.konieczny@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v1] tests/intel: Update sub-category of Xe power management tests
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2025 18:17:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z659i7WFEcPS8qbQ@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250213155740.361646-1-karthik.poosa@intel.com>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 09:27:40PM +0530, Karthik Poosa wrote:
> Change sub-category of below tests from Power management tests to below:
Why?
> * tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c to Power DFS tests.
> * tests/intel/xe_pm.c to Power suspend-resume tests.
> * tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c to Power RC6 residency tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Poosa <karthik.poosa@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c | 2 +-
> tests/intel/xe_pm.c | 2 +-
> tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c b/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
> index 1fb6d2b53..e97195b1e 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_gt_freq.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> * TEST: Test Xe GT frequency request functionality
> * Category: Core
> * Mega feature: Power management
> - * Sub-category: Power management tests
> + * Sub-category: Power DFS tests
well, I know that we are not changing voltage, but DVFS seems more
used.
Or in other words, why DFS?
Why not Frequency management?
What are these categories getting used for?
> * Functionality: frequency request
> * Test category: functionality test
> */
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pm.c b/tests/intel/xe_pm.c
> index c2026474d..644680893 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_pm.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_pm.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> * TEST: Check Power Management functionality
> * Category: Core
> * Mega feature: Power management
> - * Sub-category: Power management tests
> + * Sub-category: Power suspend-resume tests
> * Test category: functionality test
> */
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c b/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c
> index f9e96d608..f0833eb0a 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c
> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
> * TEST: Test gtidle properties
> * Category: Core
> * Mega feature: Power management
> - * Sub-category: Power management tests
> + * Sub-category: Power RC6 residency tests
RC6 is old terminology... It doesn't make sense on the Media GT.
GT-C6 seems better...
> * Functionality: GT C States
> * Test category: functionality test
> */
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-13 23:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-13 15:57 [PATCH i-g-t v1] tests/intel: Update sub-category of Xe power management tests Karthik Poosa
2025-02-13 17:07 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2025-02-13 17:22 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-13 23:17 ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-02-20 6:15 ` [PATCH i-g-t v1] " Poosa, Karthik
2025-02-26 2:13 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-02-14 11:43 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure for " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z659i7WFEcPS8qbQ@intel.com \
--to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jari.tahvanainen@intel.com \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@intel.com \
--cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
--cc=katarzyna.piecielska@intel.com \
--cc=ramadevi.gandi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.