From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9659AC02197 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 14:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037423C8EFD for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:42:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (in-5.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27E353C5584 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:42:04 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: in-5.smtp.seeweb.it; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=suse.cz (client-ip=195.135.223.130; helo=smtp-out1.suse.de; envelope-from=chrubis@suse.cz; receiver=lists.linux.it) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-5.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 914A5600687 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:42:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D051021109; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 14:42:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738593722; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uIQ/5qmBpMCp2TafQehva9Km/jMFyl83X97qdU++40k=; b=T/FTcL2MGIpiuD8DGcMgSVR1yF9cuWnR8iqheA7XBnThjJNsjeESwpNhf8eUF33+4YMfYi USGDP9+eMqsDjhKDpT+6bUiQk7nWvwZhNAg/MCaRUr+OB4EoZw5r8Xbu/ponwxLmeyuypD qyZwxVfpaG0eC+KRNH56UJMvBvCtHjQ= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738593722; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uIQ/5qmBpMCp2TafQehva9Km/jMFyl83X97qdU++40k=; b=cl9NCMdZZLZk7E9oio8Tufp/UlqN8lUl8blLtBYyfWICqkDiyzwpLFUaD04Ybu8qFl94rH /zl7QtHw0sdchIAQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1738593721; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uIQ/5qmBpMCp2TafQehva9Km/jMFyl83X97qdU++40k=; b=umhw+BzzDTxWKFvo0lbtFcWGenkwf7bWHKGLGDfO1rOtghUvStta7YEocQuvml9j0hYuPB CB8w6P9uf2lVDej/JSXX4oLwpk+aEzARivrNYFRZeASaGrA0ZDINKAghoE7hVIrsrQrIkw 88W7SF+PE8/3xtk37v1Hpn92Kd+D4ww= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1738593721; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=uIQ/5qmBpMCp2TafQehva9Km/jMFyl83X97qdU++40k=; b=oMnSMblDb5g4HIbTrA8tkKyuDuTQrX8GrJik2bPCkt1bROXHW3QtgVV3ff0kTurgTZl+hH fy/drQ0GElWtzODg== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C240413795; Mon, 3 Feb 2025 14:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 8EKbLrnVoGcDSQAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Mon, 03 Feb 2025 14:42:01 +0000 Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:42:01 +0100 From: Cyril Hrubis To: Petr Vorel Message-ID: References: <20250203-doc_tests_list-v1-1-5fe69c07b1ab@suse.com> <7f6d9a5d-284a-4c25-b491-cfd7b15da2dd@suse.com> <4f163ac1-d282-4ea1-baa7-c574b342243c@suse.com> <20250203141408.GA1266486@pevik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250203141408.GA1266486@pevik> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.30 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[99.99%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-0.999]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.3 at in-5.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH] doc: add tests catalog page X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi! > > I guess that we want group the data somewhat like: > > > - options (because command line options may be useful there) > > > - min_kver, needs_kconfigs, min_cpus, needs_drivers, needs_cmds... > > (because it may describe why tests are skipped) > > > - needs_cgroup_ctrls + cgroup knobs (for tests that use cgroups) > Also .needs_cgroup_ver, .needs_cgroup_nsdelegate That should be covered by the "cgroup knobs" > > - all_filesystems, skip_filesystems, filesystems > > > - timeout, runtime (here as well, run for longer) > > > - needs_root maybe? > > - needs_device maybe? > IMHO both can be interesting - you can list tests you loose if you don't use > root or you don't have kernel with loop device configured. > > Also there are more: .caps, .hugepages, .needs_hugetlbfs, .min_mem_avail, I guess that .caps is closer to be interanal than not. > .min_swap_avail, .dev_min_size, .needs_abi_bits, .needs_overlay (at least). And we also have supported_archs, that is probably interesting. > Why not to show all the info like it was previously? We never know what the > reader will be interested in. The chalenge here is to keep the page nicely formatted and generally well arranged, having less helps a bit there. So the idea is to skip the data that are generally mostly interesting to the test runner. The quesitos is where to draw the line. > If we are really not interested at all, I would just avoid few LTP true > internals, e.g.: .needs_checkpoints, .forks_child, .child_needs_reinit. These are really uninteresting to anone reading that documentation. -- Cyril Hrubis chrubis@suse.cz -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp