All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>
To: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	bpf@ietf.org, Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huaweicloud.com>,
	David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Puranjay Mohan <puranjay@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Quentin Monnet <qmo@kernel.org>,
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>, Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>,
	Neel Natu <neelnatu@google.com>,
	Benjamin Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for load-acquire and store-release instructions
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 00:30:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6Ffquq8IORjCqrI@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <131a817f7f2749e78e527a251ca7971588cf62f8.camel@gmail.com>

Hi Eduard,

One more question (for my understanding):

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 05:06:03PM -0800, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Sat, 2025-01-25 at 02:19 +0000, Peilin Ye wrote:
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_atomics.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/arena_atomics.c
> [...]
> 
> > +SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
> > +int load_acquire(const void *ctx)
> > +{
> > +	if (pid != (bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32))
> > +		return 0;
> 
> Nit: This check is not needed, since bpf_prog_test_run_opts() is used
>      to run the tests.

Could you explain a bit more why it's not needed?

I read commit 0f4feacc9155 ("selftests/bpf: Adding pid filtering for
atomics test") which added those 'pid' checks to atomics/ tests.  The
commit message [1] says the purpose was to "make atomics test able to
run in parallel with other tests", which I couldn't understand.

How using bpf_prog_test_run_opts() makes those 'pid' checks unnecessary?

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211006185619.364369-11-fallentree@fb.com/#r

Thanks,
Peilin Ye


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-04  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-25  2:16 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] Introduce load-acquire and store-release BPF instructions Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:17 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] bpf/verifier: Factor out atomic_ptr_type_ok() Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] bpf/verifier: Factor out check_atomic_rmw() Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf: Introduce load-acquire and store-release instructions Peilin Ye
2025-01-29  0:19   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-29 22:04     ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-29 22:42       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-30  3:10         ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-29  1:30   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-29 22:17     ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-30  0:41   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-30  3:38     ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:18 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] arm64: insn: Add BIT(23) to {load,store}_ex's mask Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] arm64: insn: Add load-acquire and store-release instructions Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] bpf, arm64: Support " Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for " Peilin Ye
2025-01-29  1:06   ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-29  2:07     ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-01-29  2:07       ` [Bpf] " Ihor Solodrai
2025-01-29  2:17       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-01-30  0:03     ` Peilin Ye
2025-02-04  0:30     ` Peilin Ye [this message]
2025-02-04  0:52       ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-02-04  1:29         ` Peilin Ye
2025-01-25  2:19 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] bpf, docs: Update instruction-set.rst " Peilin Ye
2025-01-30  0:44   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-01-30  7:33     ` Peilin Ye

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6Ffquq8IORjCqrI@google.com \
    --to=yepeilin@google.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@ietf.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brho@google.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=neelnatu@google.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=puranjay@kernel.org \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xukuohai@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.