All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>
To: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
	memxor@gmail.com, tj@kernel.org, void@manifault.com,
	changwoo@igalia.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/8] sched_ext: Add filter for scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 23:43:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6U7H2nzJzmMixdZ@gpd3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM6PR03MB50805D6F4B8710EDB304CF5C99F72@AM6PR03MB5080.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>

Hi Juntong,

On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 07:30:14PM +0000, Juntong Deng wrote:
> This patch adds filter for scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu.
> 
> The kfuncs in the scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu set can be used in select_cpu
> and other rq-locked operations.

The only function in scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu is scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl(),
which should be called exclusively from ops.select_cpu() and not from any
rq-locked ops.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Juntong Deng <juntong.deng@outlook.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/ext.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> index 8857c0709bdd..c92949aa23f6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
> @@ -6401,9 +6401,51 @@ BTF_KFUNCS_START(scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu)
>  BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, scx_bpf_select_cpu_dfl, KF_RCU)
>  BTF_KFUNCS_END(scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu)
>  
> +static int scx_kfunc_ids_other_rqlocked_filter(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id)
> +{
> +	u32 moff = prog->aux->attach_st_ops_member_off;
> +
> +	if (moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, runnable) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, dequeue) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, stopping) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, quiescent) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, yield) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, cpu_acquire) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, running) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, core_sched_before) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, set_cpumask) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, update_idle) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, tick) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, enable) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, set_weight) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, disable) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, exit_task) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, dump_task) ||
> +	    moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, dump_cpu))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return -EACCES;
> +}
> +
> +static int scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu_filter(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id)
> +{
> +	u32 moff;
> +
> +	if (!btf_id_set8_contains(&scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu, kfunc_id) ||
> +	    prog->aux->st_ops != &bpf_sched_ext_ops)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	moff = prog->aux->attach_st_ops_member_off;
> +	if (moff == offsetof(struct sched_ext_ops, select_cpu))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return scx_kfunc_ids_other_rqlocked_filter(prog, kfunc_id);

So, I think we just need to return -EACCES here.

> +}
> +
>  static const struct btf_kfunc_id_set scx_kfunc_set_select_cpu = {
>  	.owner			= THIS_MODULE,
>  	.set			= &scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu,
> +	.filter			= scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu_filter,
>  };
>  
>  static bool scx_dsq_insert_preamble(struct task_struct *p, u64 enq_flags)
> -- 
> 2.39.5
> 

Thanks,
-Andrea

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-06 22:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-05 19:27 [RFC PATCH bpf-next 0/8] bpf, sched_ext: Make kfunc filters support struct_ops context to reduce runtime overhead Juntong Deng
2025-02-05 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 1/8] bpf: Add struct_ops context information to struct bpf_prog_aux Juntong Deng
2025-02-05 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 2/8] sched_ext: Add filter for scx_kfunc_ids_select_cpu Juntong Deng
2025-02-06 22:43   ` Andrea Righi [this message]
2025-02-06 23:39   ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-07  0:02     ` Juntong Deng
2025-02-05 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 3/8] sched_ext: Add filter for scx_kfunc_ids_enqueue_dispatch Juntong Deng
2025-02-05 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 4/8] sched_ext: Add filter for scx_kfunc_ids_dispatch Juntong Deng
2025-02-05 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 5/8] sched_ext: Add filter for scx_kfunc_ids_cpu_release Juntong Deng
2025-02-05 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 6/8] sched_ext: Add filter for scx_kfunc_ids_unlocked Juntong Deng
2025-02-08  3:37   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-09 15:22     ` Andrea Righi
2025-02-10 18:05     ` Tejun Heo
2025-02-10 23:40     ` Juntong Deng
2025-02-11  3:48       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-02-14 20:30         ` Juntong Deng
2025-02-05 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 7/8] sched_ext: Removed mask-based runtime restrictions on calling kfuncs in different contexts Juntong Deng
2025-02-05 19:30 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next 8/8] selftests/sched_ext: Update enq_select_cpu_fails to adapt to struct_ops context filter Juntong Deng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6U7H2nzJzmMixdZ@gpd3 \
    --to=arighi@nvidia.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=juntong.deng@outlook.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.