All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>
To: Jian Zhang <zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com>
Cc: "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	"Jeff9 Chan(陳松儉_ASRockRack)" <Jeff9_Chan@asrockrack.com>
Subject: Re: [External] dbus-sensors issue
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2025 12:04:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6Y9CSIl8PhvV8KZ@heinlein> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51dd8bf76aa056fbc966e48132cac2607d2326ca.a3a848b5.1084.42df.ae2f.330bbfd1cd95@bytedance.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1729 bytes --]

On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 07:54:28PM +0800, Jian Zhang wrote:
> See:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230716195007.731909670@linuxfoundation.org/
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217699
> For services utilizing io_uring, when waiting for I/O, CPU time is counted as I/O rather than idle time.

Yep.  So to be clear, this is just an accounting difference.  It has no
real measurement of a performance difference.  "io_wait" is effectively
"idle" now.

For similar reasons, phosphor-health-monitor doesn't consider 'iowait'
part of the CPU utilization for determining if the CPU has been too busy
for too long:

https://github.com/openbmc/phosphor-health-monitor/blob/ba29dbdd04a96a46e1972641c20bf5a8e930ed8f/health_metric_collection.cpp#L73

> 
> Jian.
> > From: "Jeff9 Chan(陳松儉_ASRockRack)"<Jeff9_Chan@asrockrack.com>
> > Date:  Fri, Feb 7, 2025, 19:42
> > Subject:  [External] dbus-sensors issue
> > To: "openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org"<openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
> > Hi all,
> > It appears that IO wait is very high all the time. This can be viewed by running `top`. It was traced down to dbus-sensors systemd units. When the units are running, IO
>  wait is >90%. This can impact system performance and also impacts CPU utilization telemetry, since the idle task never runs, which normally means CPU is being completely utilized.
> >  
> > My platform uses below services, stop them will free the IO usage, any idea?
> >  
> > xyz.openbmc_project.hwmontempsensor.service
> > xyz.openbmc_project.fansensor.service
> > xyz.openbmc_project.adcsensor.service
> > xyz.openbmc_project.psusensor.service
> >  
> >  
> > best regards
> >  
> > Jeff Chan

-- 
Patrick Williams

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-07 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-07 11:40 dbus-sensors issue Jeff9 Chan(陳松儉_ASRockRack)
2025-02-07 11:54 ` [External] " Jian Zhang
2025-02-07 17:04   ` Patrick Williams [this message]
2025-02-09  3:31     ` Jeff9 Chan(陳松儉_ASRockRack)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6Y9CSIl8PhvV8KZ@heinlein \
    --to=patrick@stwcx.xyz \
    --cc=Jeff9_Chan@asrockrack.com \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=zhangjian.3032@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.