All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: "Raphael S. Carvalho" <raphaelsc@scylladb.com>
Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de,
	Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>
Subject: Re: Possible regression with buffered writes + NOWAIT behavior, under memory pressure
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 08:09:31 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z6prC2fBbd6UE49r@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKhLTr1UL3ePTpYjXOx2AJfNk8Ku2EdcEfu+CH1sf3Asr=B-Dw@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 03:12:24PM -0300, Raphael S. Carvalho wrote:
> While running scylladb test suite, which uses io_uring + buffered
> writes + XFS, the system was spuriously returning ENOMEM, despite
> there being plenty of available memory to be reclaimed from the page
> cache. FWIW, I am running: 6.12.9-100.fc40.x86_64
.....

> In the patch ''mm: return an ERR_PTR from __filemap_get_folio', I see
> the following changes:
> --- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> +++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
> @@ -468,19 +468,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iomap_is_partially_uptodate);
>  struct folio *iomap_get_folio(struct iomap_iter *iter, loff_t pos)
>  {
>         unsigned fgp = FGP_LOCK | FGP_WRITE | FGP_CREAT | FGP_STABLE | FGP_NOFS;
> -       struct folio *folio;
> 
>         if (iter->flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT)
>                 fgp |= FGP_NOWAIT;
> 
> -       folio = __filemap_get_folio(iter->inode->i_mapping, pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> +       return __filemap_get_folio(iter->inode->i_mapping, pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
>                         fgp, mapping_gfp_mask(iter->inode->i_mapping));
> -       if (folio)
> -               return folio;
> -
> -       if (iter->flags & IOMAP_NOWAIT)
> -               return ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN);
> -       return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>  }
> 
> This leads to me believe we have a regression in this area, after that
> patch, since iomap_get_folio() is no longer returning EAGAIN with
> IOMAP_NOWAIT, if __filemap_get_folio() failed to get a folio. Now it
> returns ENOMEM unconditionally.

Yes, I think you are right - FGP_NOWAIT error returns are not
handled correctly by __filemap_get_folio().

> Since we pushed the error picking decision to __filemap_get_folio, I
> think it makes sense for us to patch it such that it returns EAGAIN if
> allocation failed (under pressure) because IOMAP_NOWAIT was requested
> by its caller and allocation is not allowed to block waiting for
> reclaimer to do its thing.
> 
> A possible way to fix it is this one-liner, but I am not well versed
> in this area, so someone may end up suggesting a better fix:
> diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c
> index 804d7365680c..9e698a619545 100644
> --- a/mm/filemap.c
> +++ b/mm/filemap.c
> @@ -1964,7 +1964,7 @@ struct folio *__filemap_get_folio(struct
> address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index,
>                 do {
>                         gfp_t alloc_gfp = gfp;
> 
> -                       err = -ENOMEM;
> +                       err = (fgp_flags & FGP_NOWAIT) ? -ENOMEM : -EAGAIN;
>                         if (order > min_order)
>                                 alloc_gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN;
>                         folio = filemap_alloc_folio(alloc_gfp, order);

Better to only do the FGP_NOWAIT check when a failure occurs; that
puts it in the slow path rather than having to evaluate it
unnecessarily every time through the function/loop. i.e.

 		folio = filemap_alloc_folio(gfp, order);
-		if (!folio)
-			return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+		if (!folio) {
+			if (fgp_flags & FGP_NOWAIT)
+				err = -EAGAIN;
+			else
+				err = -ENOMEM;
+			continue;
+		}

-Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-02-10 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-10 18:12 Possible regression with buffered writes + NOWAIT behavior, under memory pressure Raphael S. Carvalho
2025-02-10 18:20 ` Raphael S. Carvalho
2025-02-10 18:34   ` Raphael S. Carvalho
2025-02-10 21:09 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2025-02-10 21:18   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-02-10 21:27     ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z6prC2fBbd6UE49r@dread.disaster.area \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=avi@scylladb.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=raphaelsc@scylladb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.