Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 15/18] Add kvmtool_params to test specification

[Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>]

Hi Drew,

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 04:56:42PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 03:03:09PM +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> > Hi Drew,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 04:53:29PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 04:43:13PM +0000, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> > > > arm/arm64 supports running tests under kvmtool, but kvmtool's syntax for
> > > > running a virtual machine is different than qemu's. To run tests using the
> > > > automated test infrastructure, add a new test parameter, kvmtool_params.
> > > > The parameter serves the exact purpose as qemu_params/extra_params, but using
> > > > kvmtool's syntax.
> > > 
> > > The need for qemu_params and kvmtool_params makes more sense to me now
> > > that I see the use in unittests.cfg (I wonder if we can't rearrange this
> > > series to help understand these things up front?). There's a lot of
> > 
> > Certainly, I'll move it closer to the beginning of the series.
> > 
> > > duplication, though, with having two sets of params since the test-
> > > specific inputs always have to be duplicated. To avoid the duplication
> > > I think we can use extra_params for '-append' and '--params' by
> > > parametrizing the option name for "params" (-append / --params) and then
> > > create qemu_opts and kvmtool_opts for extra options like --pmu, --mem,
> > > and irqchip.
> > 
> > How about something like this (I am using selftest-setup as an example, all the
> > other test definitions would be similarly modified):
> > 
> > diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
> > index 2bdad67d5693..3009305ba2d3 100644
> > --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
> > +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
> > @@ -15,7 +15,9 @@
> >  [selftest-setup]
> >  file = selftest.flat
> >  smp = 2
> > -extra_params = -m 256 -append 'setup smp=2 mem=256'
> > +test_args = setup smp=2 mem=256
> > +qemu_params = -m 256
> > +kvmtool_params = --mem 256
> >  groups = selftest
> > 
> > I was thinking about using 'test_args' instead of 'extra_params' to avoid any
> > confusion between the two, and to match how they are passed to a test
> > - they are in the argv main's argument.
> 
> Yes, this looks good and test_args is better than my suggestion in the
> other mail of 'cmdline_options' since "cmdline" would be ambiguous with
> the test's cmdline and the vmm's cmdline.
> 
> > 
> > Also, should I change the test definitions for all the other architectures?
> > It's not going to be possible for me to test all the changes.
> 
> We should be safe with an s/extra_params/qemu_params/ change for all
> architectures and CI is pretty good, so we'd have good confidence
> if it passes, but, I think we should keep extra_params as a qemu_params
> alias anyway since it's possible that people have wrapped kvm-unit-tests
> in test harnesses which generate unittests.cfg files.

Sounds good, split extra_params into test_args and qemu_params in all
unittests.cfg files, and keep extra_params as an alias for qemu_params.

I was thinking that maybe I should send that as a separate patch, to make
sure it gets the visibility it deserves from the other maintainers, instead
of it being buried in a 18 patch series. What do you think?

Thanks,
Alex

-- 
kvm-riscv mailing list
kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kvm-riscv