From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: Add 'tgid' sort key
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 14:17:18 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z7-S7mopgpSFm20a@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z7-May5w9VQd5QD0@x1>
On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 06:49:31PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 06:40:29PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 06:38:50PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 06:38:00PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 11:34:13AM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:48:56PM +0100, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:25:35PM +0100, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:11:17PM +0100, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 08:07:18PM +0100, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 11:51:35PM -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 08:40:37PM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 6:51 PM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 24, 2025 at 10:18:37AM -0800, Ian Rogers wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > [SNIP]
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I thought the real-time processing had to use
> > > > > > > > > > > > > maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert (rather than maps__insert) as mmap
> > > > > > > > > > > > > events only give us VMA data and two mmaps may have been merged.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Shouldn't doing this change be the simplest fix?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Make sense. How about this?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Lgtm, I have no way to test the issue. Why does maps__fixup_end need
> > > > > > > > > > > to get pushed later?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I just noticed it would add extra kernel maps after modules. I think it
> > > > > > > > > > should fixup end address of the kernel maps after adding all maps first.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Arnaldo, can you please test this?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Trying it now.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Now we have something different:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > root@number:~# perf record sleep
> > > > > > > > sleep: missing operand
> > > > > > > > Try 'sleep --help' for more information.
> > > > > > > > [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> > > > > > > > perf: util/maps.c:80: check_invariants: Assertion `RC_CHK_EQUAL(map__kmap(map)->kmaps, maps)' failed.
> > > > > > > > Aborted (core dumped)
> > > > > > > > root@number:~#
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > __maps__insert() does:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > if (dso && dso__kernel(dso)) {
> > > > > > > struct kmap *kmap = map__kmap(new);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > if (kmap)
> > > > > > > kmap->kmaps = maps;
> > > > > > > else
> > > > > > > pr_err("Internal error: kernel dso with non kernel map\n");
> > > > > > > }
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > while maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert() doesn't.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > It calls __maps__insert_sorted() that probably should do what
> > > > > > > __maps__insert() does?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ok, so I did the following patch but this case fails:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > @@ -910,6 +928,7 @@ static int __maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert(struct maps *maps, struct map *new)
> > > > > > */
> > > > > > map__put(maps_by_address[i]);
> > > > > > maps_by_address[i] = map__get(new);
> > > > > > + map__set_kmap(new, maps);
> > > > > > check_invariants(maps);
> > > > > > return err;
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > perf: util/maps.c:110: check_invariants: Assertion `refcount_read(map__refcnt(map)) > 1' failed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 106 /*
> > > > > > 107 * Maps by name maps should be in maps_by_address, so
> > > > > > 108 * the reference count should be higher.
> > > > > > 109 */
> > > > > > 110 assert(refcount_read(map__refcnt(map)) > 1);
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since it is just replacing the map in the maps_by_address and not
> > > > > > touching on the maps_by_name? Thus the refcount is just 1:
>
> > > > > Sounds like it. Can you add this on top?
>
> > > > Trying, but somehow its not applying cleanly, checking:
>
> > > > ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools]$ patch -p1 < ~/wb/1.patch
> > > > patching file tools/perf/util/maps.c
> > > > Hunk #1 succeeded at 815 (offset 18 lines).
> > > > Hunk #2 succeeded at 826 (offset 18 lines).
> > > > Hunk #3 succeeded at 846 (offset 18 lines).
> > > > Hunk #4 succeeded at 893 (offset 18 lines).
> > > > Hunk #5 succeeded at 919 (offset 18 lines).
> > > > Hunk #6 FAILED at 923.
> > > > 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file tools/perf/util/maps.c.rej
> > > > ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools]$
>
> > > > ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools]$ git log --oneline -5
> > > > 4a9f5d76130b707f (HEAD -> perf-tools) wip: acme
> > > > d5ba0f5af35937c7 wip: namhyung
> > > > 42367eca7604e16e (perf-tools/tmp.perf-tools, perf-tools/perf-tools) tools: Remove redundant quiet setup
> > > > 293f324ce96d7001 tools: Unify top-level quiet infrastructure
> > > > 9fae5884bb0e3480 (tag: perf-tools-fixes-for-v6.14-2025-01-30) perf cpumap: Fix die and cluster IDs
> > > > ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools]$
>
> > > ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools]$ cat tools/perf/util/maps.c.rej
> > > --- tools/perf/util/maps.c
> > > +++ tools/perf/util/maps.c
> > > @@ -923,6 +936,10 @@ static int __maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert(struct maps *maps, struct map *new)
> > > */
> > > map__put(maps_by_address[i]);
> > > maps_by_address[i] = map__get(new);
> > > + if (maps_by_name) {
> > > + map__put(maps_by_name[ni]);
> > > + maps_by_name[ni] = map__get(new);
> > > + }
> > > check_invariants(maps);
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > > ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools]$
>
> > > Fixing this up by hand
>
> > I see, I had tried this after sending that patch:
>
> > map__set_kmap(new, maps);
>
> > Before check_invariants(), but that doesn't make sense, I should've
> > dropped that, doing it now.
>
> Nope, it still triggers:
>
> 930 } else {
> 931 struct map *next = NULL;
> 932
> 933 if (i + 1 < maps__nr_maps(maps))
> 934 next = maps_by_address[i + 1];
> 935
> 936 if (!next || map__start(next) >= map__end(new)) {
> 937 /*
> 938 * Replace existing mapping and end knowing
> 939 * there aren't later overlapping or any
> 940 * mappings.
> 941 */
> 942 map__put(maps_by_address[i]);
> 943 maps_by_address[i] = map__get(new);
> 944 if (maps_by_name) {
> 945 map__put(maps_by_name[ni]);
> 946 maps_by_name[ni] = map__get(new);
> 947 }
> 948 check_invariants(maps);
> 949 return err;
> 950 }
> 951 __maps__remove(maps, pos);
> 952 check_invariants(maps);
> 953 /*
> 954 * Maps are ordered but no need to increase `i` as the
> 955 * later maps were moved down.
> 956 */
> 957 }
>
>
> perf: util/maps.c:80: check_invariants: Assertion `RC_CHK_EQUAL(map__kmap(map)->kmaps, maps)' failed.
>
> Thread 1 "perf" received signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
> __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44
> 44 return INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERROR_P (ret) ? INTERNAL_SYSCALL_ERRNO (ret) : 0;
> (gdb) bt
> #0 __pthread_kill_implementation (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=signo@entry=6, no_tid=no_tid@entry=0) at pthread_kill.c:44
> #1 0x00007ffff6ea80a3 in __pthread_kill_internal (threadid=<optimized out>, signo=6) at pthread_kill.c:78
> #2 0x00007ffff6e4ef1e in __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/posix/raise.c:26
> #3 0x00007ffff6e36902 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79
> #4 0x00007ffff6e3681e in __assert_fail_base (fmt=0x7ffff6fc3bb8 "%s%s%s:%u: %s%sAssertion `%s' failed.\n%n", assertion=assertion@entry=0x7bfd08 "RC_CHK_EQUAL(map__kmap(map)->kmaps, maps)",
> file=file@entry=0x7bfc53 "util/maps.c", line=line@entry=80, function=function@entry=0x7c0010 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.6> "check_invariants") at assert.c:96
> #5 0x00007ffff6e47047 in __assert_fail (assertion=0x7bfd08 "RC_CHK_EQUAL(map__kmap(map)->kmaps, maps)", file=0x7bfc53 "util/maps.c", line=80,
> function=0x7c0010 <__PRETTY_FUNCTION__.6> "check_invariants") at assert.c:105
> #6 0x0000000000633c74 in check_invariants (maps=0xf977c0) at util/maps.c:80
> #7 0x00000000006363a6 in __maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert (maps=0xf977c0, new=0xfc57e0) at util/maps.c:948
> #8 0x0000000000636460 in maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert (maps=0xf977c0, new=0xfc57e0) at util/maps.c:970
> #9 0x000000000062920a in machine__process_ksymbol_register (machine=0xf97158, event=0x7ffff7fbaba8, sample=0x7fffffffa860) at util/machine.c:715
> #10 0x00000000006294ca in machine__process_ksymbol (machine=0xf97158, event=0x7ffff7fbaba8, sample=0x7fffffffa860) at util/machine.c:779
> #11 0x00000000005ce2fd in perf_event__process_ksymbol (tool=0xec9ce0 <record>, event=0x7ffff7fbaba8, sample=0x7fffffffa860, machine=0xf97158) at util/event.c:296
> #12 0x000000000063b860 in machines__deliver_event (machines=0xf97158, evlist=0xf531f0, event=0x7ffff7fbaba8, sample=0x7fffffffa860, tool=0xec9ce0 <record>, file_offset=35752,
> file_path=0xf97850 "perf.data") at util/session.c:1334
> #13 0x000000000063ba45 in perf_session__deliver_event (session=0xf96f40, event=0x7ffff7fbaba8, tool=0xec9ce0 <record>, file_offset=35752, file_path=0xf97850 "perf.data")
> at util/session.c:1367
> #14 0x000000000063c839 in perf_session__process_event (session=0xf96f40, event=0x7ffff7fbaba8, file_offset=35752, file_path=0xf97850 "perf.data") at util/session.c:1626
> #15 0x000000000063dfb9 in process_simple (session=0xf96f40, event=0x7ffff7fbaba8, file_offset=35752, file_path=0xf97850 "perf.data") at util/session.c:2203
> #16 0x000000000063dc70 in reader__read_event (rd=0x7fffffffafa0, session=0xf96f40, prog=0x7fffffffaf70) at util/session.c:2132
> #17 0x000000000063de6a in reader__process_events (rd=0x7fffffffafa0, session=0xf96f40, prog=0x7fffffffaf70) at util/session.c:2181
> #18 0x000000000063e107 in __perf_session__process_events (session=0xf96f40) at util/session.c:2226
> #19 0x000000000063eb04 in perf_session__process_events (session=0xf96f40) at util/session.c:2390
> #20 0x000000000042d98b in process_buildids (rec=0xec9ce0 <record>) at builtin-record.c:1475
> #21 0x000000000042e963 in record__finish_output (rec=0xec9ce0 <record>) at builtin-record.c:1798
> #22 0x0000000000431c46 in __cmd_record (rec=0xec9ce0 <record>, argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffde80) at builtin-record.c:2841
> #23 0x000000000043513f in cmd_record (argc=2, argv=0x7fffffffde80) at builtin-record.c:4260
> #24 0x00000000004bcf65 in run_builtin (p=0xeccd60 <commands+288>, argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffde80) at perf.c:351
> #25 0x00000000004bd20c in handle_internal_command (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffde80) at perf.c:404
> #26 0x00000000004bd365 in run_argv (argcp=0x7fffffffdc6c, argv=0x7fffffffdc60) at perf.c:448
> #27 0x00000000004bd6ae in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffffffde80) at perf.c:556
> (gdb)
>
> humm, it seems that thing I removed may be needed after all...
>
> Yeah, please check if adding this, on top of your latest (second) patch,
> makese sense:
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/maps.c b/tools/perf/util/maps.c
> index a710720e8bcfd305..776bbdaafdb32269 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/maps.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/maps.c
> @@ -945,6 +945,7 @@ static int __maps__fixup_overlap_and_insert(struct maps *maps, struct map *new)
> map__put(maps_by_name[ni]);
> maps_by_name[ni] = map__get(new);
> }
> + map__set_kmap(new, maps);
> check_invariants(maps);
> return err;
> }
> ⬢ [acme@toolbox perf-tools]$
>
>
> With your two patches and my two patches finally I get:
>
> root@number:~# perf record sleep 1
> [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.035 MB perf.data (14 samples) ]
> root@number:~#
>
> on a perf-tools/perf-tools build with DEBUG=1
Great! Can you please send the final version as a formal patch?
Thanks,
Namhyung
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 0:01 [PATCH] perf report: Add 'tgid' sort key Namhyung Kim
2025-02-11 22:43 ` Ian Rogers
2025-02-12 21:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-12 21:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-12 21:59 ` Ian Rogers
2025-02-12 22:10 ` Ian Rogers
2025-02-13 1:52 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-14 22:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-18 20:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-18 21:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-18 22:03 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-19 14:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-19 14:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-19 21:10 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-20 17:12 ` Ian Rogers
2025-02-21 7:04 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-24 18:18 ` Ian Rogers
2025-02-25 2:51 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-25 4:40 ` Ian Rogers
2025-02-25 7:51 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-25 19:07 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-25 19:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-25 19:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-25 19:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-26 19:34 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-26 21:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-26 21:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-26 21:40 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-26 21:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2025-02-26 22:17 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z7-S7mopgpSFm20a@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.