From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from complex.crustytoothpaste.net (complex.crustytoothpaste.net [172.105.7.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9488C1F419C for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740435004; cv=none; b=co4CanvFO76QlUg0vLWKfxThwNJcNiKfY3WhqMOi9uFIBKABRyF3DvukR4SwhSiYZFaFBOZ4mXaSOpdgzRXrrmZQhbEr/APkFA9U7N8idI8IbVDG/OuMvtZpEpOPC8qojh43S7aaX/1uKwxGzHYVJhaJjdNxmYZMvGyGlgdyXjQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1740435004; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UcOJMnjgVhbX2i3GOhjgPkTUuYmaoOu6xH6kt8g15bA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=PdHxKo9uxuQEtQgZ5gcbRVFmq78lO6iTGlbJBrmqDktsb/icFDIHxx1nTauH1q77dP+dPAMzCIGTYIuucTM/vaFw3M2PZqbSrx7q4UW8EX9cUBkuCK9E06fSAtRNpb2sdb0+QjXy/QBOBXeCpvT1c836rpfqAGR/VeksOmis8QY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b=ZRKihqVB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b="ZRKihqVB" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1740434993; bh=UcOJMnjgVhbX2i3GOhjgPkTUuYmaoOu6xH6kt8g15bA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=ZRKihqVBxsWEORYlog6CuJn5yqlasm7+y3SzaQsaZUG90v/mEqVfPoJz7DX5cQqjz 1OHLAmguGGLGoite0K9lfXLrrICoFjv1GbgrX3qnofxESioMFdy5aWKy7FTVy1yZmC MvfgHFKOAiIGYCFAajqMXF7Hcn3rt/Pt4NQCLf8zOCGiCV0pnuBAXJlZtOyG5827P9 tsz2MSEpesIupCpS/Q7qe/Iei32BklQOCBSkDEw3Xpb8YLsk6S+g0UMRtJah9X/hyk 60toL7djdjQGyaaINqU93Fso/3P19UcBhOa+xvqz3W3V3tcFzic5UV7s51Yiqa50dd 7NiV88GqC0ck1BLbcZkasPwTJiA+Jrld/yYxuRhQz/AtxVt71rT6xMBnVQj8hPm81x idivZruQNx1deMtj0Mjfz7ePwQxwzDGZYba49lWualSWZOc6aVM9IZ6Lk+AJv+Tik8 51VGrGqfTbdW/F+gJ8syo4RXkmRAyUVfeJxdOI3a99QWCHxvMFD Received: from tapette.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:b056:101:49c7:e12c:a55a:81cc]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by complex.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF0C62008B; Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 22:09:52 +0000 From: "brian m. carlson" To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Fix netrc usage with WebDAV-based HTTP protocol Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: "brian m. carlson" , Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org References: <20250223015331.588161-1-sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WceEeUdIA+Dc2Cxr" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.13 (2024-03-09) --WceEeUdIA+Dc2Cxr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2025-02-24 at 16:46:29, Junio C Hamano wrote: > "brian m. carlson" writes: >=20 > > However, I think we need to either decide that we're going to support > > this as a fully-fledged feature and add documentation and sufficient > > tests, or remove it, since it's not reasonable to have undocumented, > > untested features that people rely on. >=20 > Does "this" refer to "use of netrc in HTTP code paths", or "HTTP > walker"? I am kind of surprised that anybody is still using the > latter, regardless of where the credential is locally stored. It refers to netrc in HTTP code paths. There are definitely people using the WebDAV-based HTTP protocol still, but after reading the comment in the code that implies that we don't read packed-refs, I'm less and less inclined to say that's a good idea. It's probably going to die pretty quickly when we move to reftable, though, since that protocol only works with the files backend. --=20 brian m. carlson (they/them or he/him) Toronto, Ontario, CA --WceEeUdIA+Dc2Cxr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.2.46 (GNU/Linux) iHUEABYKAB0WIQQILOaKnbxl+4PRw5F8DEliiIeigQUCZ7zuMAAKCRB8DEliiIei gemtAP4mZiWTA5Lj/nvnqAYDdSQoTKD+1N4KGCp1r6y2rk8yTgEA+0V/6CZfyDUd euf6eZCgdGTP2DpWBWuyBFSqG4kODgI= =MOyd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WceEeUdIA+Dc2Cxr--