Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] selftests/xsk: Add tail adjustment tests and support check

[Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>]

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 02:27:37PM +0000, Tushar Vyavahare wrote:
> Introduce tail adjustment functionality in xskxceiver using
> bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(). Add `xsk_xdp_adjust_tail` to modify packet sizes
> and drop unmodified packets. Implement `is_adjust_tail_supported` to check
> helper availability. Develop packet resizing tests, including shrinking
> and growing scenarios, with functions for both single-buffer and
> multi-buffer cases. Update the test framework to handle various scenarios
> and adjust MTU settings. These changes enhance the testing of packet tail
> adjustments, improving AF_XDP framework reliability.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tushar Vyavahare <tushar.vyavahare@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/xsk_xdp_progs.c       |  48 +++++++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk_xdp_common.h  |   1 +
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c      | 118 +++++++++++++++++-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h      |   2 +
>  4 files changed, 167 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xsk_xdp_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xsk_xdp_progs.c
> index ccde6a4c6319..2e8e2faf17e0 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xsk_xdp_progs.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xsk_xdp_progs.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
>  #include <linux/bpf.h>
>  #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
>  #include <linux/if_ether.h>
> +#include <linux/ip.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>  #include "xsk_xdp_common.h"
>  
>  struct {
> @@ -70,4 +72,50 @@ SEC("xdp") int xsk_xdp_shared_umem(struct xdp_md *xdp)
>  	return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, idx, XDP_DROP);
>  }
>  
> +SEC("xdp.frags") int xsk_xdp_adjust_tail(struct xdp_md *xdp)
> +{
> +	__u32 buff_len, curr_buff_len;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	buff_len = bpf_xdp_get_buff_len(xdp);
> +	if (buff_len == 0)
> +		return XDP_DROP;
> +
> +	ret = bpf_xdp_adjust_tail(xdp, count);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
> +		/* Handle unsupported cases */
> +		if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP) {
> +			/* Set count to -EOPNOTSUPP to indicate to userspace that this case is
> +			 * unsupported
> +			 */
> +			count = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +			return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, 0, XDP_DROP);

is this whole eopnotsupp dance worth the hassle?

this basically breaks down to underlying driver not supporting xdp
multi-buffer. we already store this state in ifobj->multi_buff_supp.

could we just check for that and skip the test case instead of using the
count global variable to store the error code which is counter intuitive?

> +		}
> +
> +		return XDP_DROP;
> +	}
> +
> +	curr_buff_len = bpf_xdp_get_buff_len(xdp);
> +	if (curr_buff_len != buff_len + count)
> +		return XDP_DROP;
> +
> +	if (curr_buff_len > buff_len) {
> +		__u32 *pkt_data = (void *)(long)xdp->data;
> +		__u32 len, words_to_end, seq_num;
> +
> +		len = curr_buff_len - PKT_HDR_ALIGN;
> +		words_to_end = len / sizeof(*pkt_data) - 1;
> +		seq_num = words_to_end;
> +
> +		/* Convert sequence number to network byte order. Store this in the last 4 bytes of
> +		 * the packet. Use 'count' to determine the position at the end of the packet for
> +		 * storing the sequence number.
> +		 */
> +		seq_num = __constant_htonl(words_to_end);
> +		bpf_xdp_store_bytes(xdp, curr_buff_len - count, &seq_num, sizeof(seq_num));
> +	}
> +
> +	return bpf_redirect_map(&xsk, 0, XDP_DROP);
> +}
> +
>  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk_xdp_common.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk_xdp_common.h
> index 5a6f36f07383..45810ff552da 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk_xdp_common.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xsk_xdp_common.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
>  #define XSK_XDP_COMMON_H_
>  
>  #define MAX_SOCKETS 2
> +#define PKT_HDR_ALIGN (sizeof(struct ethhdr) + 2) /* Just to align the data in the packet */
>  
>  struct xdp_info {
>  	__u64 count;
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> index d60ee6a31c09..ee196b638662 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
> @@ -524,6 +524,8 @@ static void __test_spec_init(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobj_tx,
>  	test->nb_sockets = 1;
>  	test->fail = false;
>  	test->set_ring = false;
> +	test->adjust_tail = false;
> +	test->adjust_tail_support = false;
>  	test->mtu = MAX_ETH_PKT_SIZE;
>  	test->xdp_prog_rx = ifobj_rx->xdp_progs->progs.xsk_def_prog;
>  	test->xskmap_rx = ifobj_rx->xdp_progs->maps.xsk;
> @@ -992,6 +994,31 @@ static bool is_metadata_correct(struct pkt *pkt, void *buffer, u64 addr)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +static bool is_adjust_tail_supported(struct xsk_xdp_progs *skel_rx)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_map *data_map;
> +	int value = 0;
> +	int key = 0;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(skel_rx->obj, "xsk_xdp_.bss");
> +	if (!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map)) {
> +		ksft_print_msg("Error: could not find bss section of XDP program\n");
> +		exit_with_error(errno);
> +	}
> +
> +	ret = bpf_map_lookup_elem(bpf_map__fd(data_map), &key, &value);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		ksft_print_msg("Error: bpf_map_lookup_elem failed with error %d\n", ret);
> +		return false;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Set the 'count' variable to -EOPNOTSUPP in the XDP program if the adjust_tail helper is
> +	 * not supported. Skip the adjust_tail test case in this scenario.
> +	 */
> +	return value != -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
>  static bool is_frag_valid(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u64 addr, u32 len, u32 expected_pkt_nb,
>  			  u32 bytes_processed)
>  {
> @@ -1768,8 +1795,13 @@ static void *worker_testapp_validate_rx(void *arg)
>  
>  	if (!err && ifobject->validation_func)
>  		err = ifobject->validation_func(ifobject);
> -	if (err)
> -		report_failure(test);
> +
> +	if (err) {
> +		if (test->adjust_tail && !is_adjust_tail_supported(ifobject->xdp_progs))
> +			test->adjust_tail_support = false;
> +		else
> +			report_failure(test);
> +	}
>  
>  	pthread_exit(NULL);
>  }
> @@ -2516,6 +2548,84 @@ static int testapp_hw_sw_max_ring_size(struct test_spec *test)
>  	return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
>  }
>  
> +static int testapp_xdp_adjust_tail(struct test_spec *test, int count)
> +{
> +	struct xsk_xdp_progs *skel_rx = test->ifobj_rx->xdp_progs;
> +	struct xsk_xdp_progs *skel_tx = test->ifobj_tx->xdp_progs;
> +	struct bpf_map *data_map;
> +	int key = 0;
> +
> +	test_spec_set_xdp_prog(test, skel_rx->progs.xsk_xdp_adjust_tail,
> +			       skel_tx->progs.xsk_xdp_adjust_tail,
> +			       skel_rx->maps.xsk, skel_tx->maps.xsk);
> +
> +	data_map = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(skel_rx->obj, "xsk_xdp_.bss");
> +	if (!data_map || !bpf_map__is_internal(data_map)) {
> +		ksft_print_msg("Error: could not find bss section of XDP program\n");
> +		return TEST_FAILURE;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (bpf_map_update_elem(bpf_map__fd(data_map), &key, &count, BPF_ANY)) {
> +		ksft_print_msg("Error: could not update count element\n");
> +		return TEST_FAILURE;
> +	}
> +
> +	return testapp_validate_traffic(test);
> +}
> +
> +static int testapp_adjust_tail(struct test_spec *test, u32 value, u32 pkt_len)
> +{
> +	u32 pkt_cnt = DEFAULT_BATCH_SIZE;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	test->adjust_tail_support = true;
> +	test->adjust_tail = true;
> +	test->total_steps = 1;
> +
> +	pkt_stream_replace_ifobject(test->ifobj_tx, pkt_cnt, pkt_len);
> +	pkt_stream_replace_ifobject(test->ifobj_rx, pkt_cnt, pkt_len + value);
> +
> +	ret = testapp_xdp_adjust_tail(test, value);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	if (!test->adjust_tail_support) {
> +		ksft_test_result_skip("%s %sResize pkt with bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() not supported\n",
> +				      mode_string(test), busy_poll_string(test));
> +	return TEST_SKIP;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int testapp_adjust_tail_common(struct test_spec *test, int adjust_value, u32 len,
> +				      bool set_mtu)
> +{
> +	if (set_mtu)
> +		test->mtu = MAX_ETH_JUMBO_SIZE;

couldn't we base this on BPF_F_XDP_HAS_FRAGS in some way instead of
boolean var?

> +	return testapp_adjust_tail(test, adjust_value, len);
> +}
> +
> +static int testapp_adjust_tail_shrink(struct test_spec *test)
> +{
> +	return testapp_adjust_tail_common(test, -4, MIN_PKT_SIZE, false);
> +}
> +
> +static int testapp_adjust_tail_shrink_mb(struct test_spec *test)
> +{
> +	return testapp_adjust_tail_common(test, -4, XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS * 3, true);
> +}
> +
> +static int testapp_adjust_tail_grow(struct test_spec *test)
> +{
> +	return testapp_adjust_tail_common(test, 4, MIN_PKT_SIZE, false);
> +}
> +
> +static int testapp_adjust_tail_grow_mb(struct test_spec *test)
> +{
> +	return testapp_adjust_tail_common(test, 4, XSK_RING_PROD__DEFAULT_NUM_DESCS * 3, true);
> +}
> +
>  static void run_pkt_test(struct test_spec *test)
>  {
>  	int ret;
> @@ -2622,6 +2732,10 @@ static const struct test_spec tests[] = {
>  	{.name = "TOO_MANY_FRAGS", .test_func = testapp_too_many_frags},
>  	{.name = "HW_SW_MIN_RING_SIZE", .test_func = testapp_hw_sw_min_ring_size},
>  	{.name = "HW_SW_MAX_RING_SIZE", .test_func = testapp_hw_sw_max_ring_size},
> +	{.name = "XDP_ADJUST_TAIL_SHRINK", .test_func = testapp_adjust_tail_shrink},
> +	{.name = "XDP_ADJUST_TAIL_SHRINK_MULTI_BUFF", .test_func = testapp_adjust_tail_shrink_mb},
> +	{.name = "XDP_ADJUST_TAIL_GROW", .test_func = testapp_adjust_tail_grow},
> +	{.name = "XDP_ADJUST_TAIL_GROW_MULTI_BUFF", .test_func = testapp_adjust_tail_grow_mb},
>  	};
>  
>  static void print_tests(void)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
> index e46e823f6a1a..67fc44b2813b 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
> @@ -173,6 +173,8 @@ struct test_spec {
>  	u16 nb_sockets;
>  	bool fail;
>  	bool set_ring;
> +	bool adjust_tail;
> +	bool adjust_tail_support;
>  	enum test_mode mode;
>  	char name[MAX_TEST_NAME_SIZE];
>  };
> -- 
> 2.34.1
>