From: Qasim Ijaz <qasdev00@gmail.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
James Smart <james.smart@broadcom.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme-fc: Simplify minimum determination in two functions
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 15:40:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8HY1RX5-SOjYOdx@qasdev.system> (raw)
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 01:45:21PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 13:38:38 +0100
>
> Replace nested min() calls by single min3() call in two
> function implementations.
>
> This issue was transformed by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
> drivers/nvme/host/fc.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
> index b9929a5a7f4e..6eed3ecdbaf6 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/fc.c
> @@ -2858,8 +2858,7 @@ nvme_fc_create_io_queues(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl)
> unsigned int nr_io_queues;
> int ret;
>
> - nr_io_queues = min(min(opts->nr_io_queues, num_online_cpus()),
> - ctrl->lport->ops->max_hw_queues);
> + nr_io_queues = min3(opts->nr_io_queues, num_online_cpus(), ctrl->lport->ops->max_hw_queues);
> ret = nvme_set_queue_count(&ctrl->ctrl, &nr_io_queues);
> if (ret) {
> dev_info(ctrl->ctrl.device,
> @@ -2912,8 +2911,7 @@ nvme_fc_recreate_io_queues(struct nvme_fc_ctrl *ctrl)
> unsigned int nr_io_queues;
> int ret;
>
> - nr_io_queues = min(min(opts->nr_io_queues, num_online_cpus()),
> - ctrl->lport->ops->max_hw_queues);
> + nr_io_queues = min3(opts->nr_io_queues, num_online_cpus(), ctrl->lport->ops->max_hw_queues);
> ret = nvme_set_queue_count(&ctrl->ctrl, &nr_io_queues);
> if (ret) {
> dev_info(ctrl->ctrl.device,
> --
> 2.48.1
>
Hi Markus,
I have already submitted a patch for this twice in the past:
4th Feb: <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250204201256.117194-1-qasdev00@gmail.com/>
13th Feb: <https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250213221622.81457-1-qasdev00@gmail.com/>
>
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-28 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 15:40 Qasim Ijaz [this message]
2025-02-28 16:00 ` nvme-fc: Simplify minimum determination in two functions Markus Elfring
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-28 12:45 [PATCH] " Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8HY1RX5-SOjYOdx@qasdev.system \
--to=qasdev00@gmail.com \
--cc=6b6d7ad3-7d25-4cf2-ab96-ddeed341599a@web.de \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=james.smart@broadcom.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.