Re: [PATCH v3 04/10] selftests/mm/uffd: Rename nr_cpus -> nr_threads

[Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>]

On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:48:38PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/03/25 3:17 pm, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 11:06:35PM +0530, Dev Jain wrote:
> > > Taking a cursory look at the test, it creates three threads for each cpu.
> > > The bounding of the variable is fine but that being the reason to rename the
> > > variable is not making sense to me.
> > 
> > Hmm yeah the name needs to be more abstract. Do you think nr_workers
> > would be confusing? Or even just "parallelism" or nr_parallel? Or any
> > other ideas?
> > 
> > FWIW I briefly looked at just cleaning this up to remove the global
> > variable but that's a bigger time investment than I can afford here I
> > think. (The local variable in stress() would still need a better name
> > anyway).
> > 
> > Thanks for the review BTW!
> 
> Your welcome.
> 
> I personally prefer leaving it as is; unless someone comes up and completely
> cleans up the structure, let us save our collective brain cycles for more
> meaningful battles than renaming variables :)

Hmm, I think that's a false economy on brain cycles. A variable called
nr_cpus that isn't a number of CPUs is bound to waste a bunch of
mental energy at some point in the future.

Unless you strongly object I'll go for nr_parallel. It's not a great
name but, well... I think that probably just suggests it's not a great
variable, and I don't have time to fix that.