From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBA2125DCE5 for ; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 18:37:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.148 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741113451; cv=none; b=nvuu0kS5oIjCD7DkbVGRC/AqOQXx85DQp8Vejdih50BL1inbqirRUEXy9MhSxFQX3ZLlMybIuks770NjAedBqyEzXNqc67lZ9KNRw3JXVP+ES56xYvokgszV0YzsygOqUde/N36GWH/lsbv6uYdtFEa3xjayYN1UziL7z9wo3ms= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741113451; c=relaxed/simple; bh=z21m6Z3sbFxQB6y1x02+M0S6qFO7HTaQzNVhL6SDiMo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OAVLd645HGBsJWBqxX3fW99xRQ+q4pj64Ou99EkQPMzdVq7/RCB8qEjWNtexHzdMgkzHCDJjBqkx5HEZ65BAbJkQk5udB2RiOMsKUEhrhtEhJqlBPdtwgFChdcwy6jLmhtbx1gNBy49eh99DgF4B30tb57lYnFn4U00NYIymPlQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b=URrARlvU; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=m31dqN5w; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.148 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pobox.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pobox.com header.i=@pobox.com header.b="URrARlvU"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="m31dqN5w" Received: from phl-compute-08.internal (phl-compute-08.phl.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF431382753; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:37:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-08.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 04 Mar 2025 13:37:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1741113448; x=1741199848; bh=jheO4Gxjzz 1OuqoYQI5TEPvboGNcmb7Faiy8plN2xME=; b=URrARlvUKuhkYcDLrNi3mtS2IO 2PFpqmoRtJ9FxeMFN9OF+17JkF47BchefHtW0PzT4WIAxjE6WwoNEu5E+IYozbPO KAPR461gx4J2/RSj75Bf4nrToOY3iqEoS7I2xZU+zVOS9KtIeRLk4DgVNLQSndoU vaP+rYNW0tCnLazYGQqb201DY/SKDADT1IbQXyXbTN//8W/OILyIsT8mGkiV9oTs CuSi3GSN6lU8coGwR4i+X4D6E0VhfnUMM2Dff5OwnS3Rt385/PqocO0SQGwhYv7G NZumdJvOZMF6oTrFIwF3zesCJJtSO3mvB3JTON3gBQENeIYAAmkJ4umAlw4A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1741113448; x=1741199848; bh=jheO4Gxjzz1OuqoYQI5TEPvboGNcmb7Faiy 8plN2xME=; b=m31dqN5weMKcmJ3+PASiwMFwkRDVyl7bk/JOBp20mx1bpgPjRP2 S23mjFjNEGxsJVFX82glCMY95F6PZFM2AbrjR0FmmfEMs2fLHtmMAazH0I9Rot9P dtL+EdFhP9SGe9BCnvW2NQxH0LegNRB02gkXMknYyoa2LYWhqOL1TnoZ6gLJV+Lm FuwZJjqyzLxwBALIeciOj4FdhNnVtw5GeHc+0jLMWM6e1Lj7cTf+7hOj02MTcyim um/lblImKPHzQqvHAle9lFA+rv+GMCRX0dJr9VXG8VXdzKGzgN5k7Kntze9wBAtk tgi6L0xL6QUXUTaCccitd385Y9VW0yLnx6A== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddutddvjeekucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddt vdenucfhrhhomhepvfhougguucgkuhhllhhinhhgvghruceothhmiiesphhosghogidrtg homheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgeeuveeiffdufeffgeevtefgvdduteffveefffej ieehtedvveffhedvfeekgeeknecuffhomhgrihhnpehfvgguohhrrghprhhojhgvtghtrd horhhgnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep thhmiiesphhosghogidrtghomhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepfedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtph houhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdprhgtphhtthho pehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepshhtohhlvggvse hgmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: ia13843cf:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:37:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:37:26 -0500 From: Todd Zullinger To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Derrick Stolee Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.49.0-rc1 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Junio C Hamano wrote: > A release candidate Git v2.49.0-rc1 is now available for testing at > the usual places. It is comprised of 367 non-merge commits since > v2.48.0, contributed by 68 people, 17 of which are new faces [*]. [...] > * Lazy-loading missing files in a blobless clone on demand is costly > as it tends to be one-blob-at-a-time. "git backfill" is introduced > to help bulk-download necessary files beforehand. In , I noted that one of the git backfill command's test fails on s390x: expecting success of 5620.4 'do partial clone 2, backfill min batch size': git clone --no-checkout --filter=blob:none \ --single-branch --branch=main \ "file://$(pwd)/srv.bare" backfill2 && GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$(pwd)/batch-trace" git \ -C backfill2 backfill --min-batch-size=20 && # Batches were used test_trace2_data promisor fetch_count 20 matches && test_line_count = 2 matches && test_trace2_data promisor fetch_count 8 revs2 && test_line_count = 0 revs2 +++ pwd ++ git clone --no-checkout --filter=blob:none --single-branch --branch=main 'file:///tmp/git-t.6AFX/trash directory.t5620-backfill/srv.bare' backfill2 ok 3 - do partial clone 1, backfill gets all objects Cloning into 'backfill2'... +++ pwd ++ GIT_TRACE2_EVENT='/tmp/git-t.6AFX/trash directory.t5620-backfill/batch-trace' ++ git -C backfill2 backfill --min-batch-size=20 ++ test_trace2_data promisor fetch_count 20 ++ grep -e '"category":"promisor","key":"fetch_count","value":"20"' error: last command exited with $?=1 not ok 4 - do partial clone 2, backfill min batch size Being a new command, perhaps it's not terrible if it doesn't work on a less popular architecture, but I don't want to let it slip past without anyone noticing. As I mentioned the other day, I don't have shell access to the s390x host, but can run the test suite with additional debugging if needed. I have the test-results directory from the build as well. If anyone wants to poke at it, the full build log (which contains the test-results directory as a base64-encoded, zst-compressed tar archive) can be found here for a few weeks: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7999/129807999/build.log -- Todd