All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@gmail.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 3/4] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 13:46:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8hHrIz2wwAMtQc8@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250214-scanf-kunit-convert-v8-3-5ea50f95f83c@gmail.com>

On Fri 2025-02-14 11:20:00, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> Convert the scanf() self-test to a KUnit test.
> 
> In the interest of keeping the patch reasonably-sized this doesn't
> refactor the tests into proper parameterized tests - it's all one big
> test case.
> 
> --- a/lib/test_scanf.c
> +++ b/lib/tests/scanf_kunit.c
> @@ -15,48 +13,35 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  
> -#include "../tools/testing/selftests/kselftest_module.h"
> -
>  #define BUF_SIZE 1024
>  
> -KSTM_MODULE_GLOBALS();
> -static char *test_buffer __initdata;
> -static char *fmt_buffer __initdata;
> -static struct rnd_state rnd_state __initdata;
> +static char *test_buffer;
> +static char *fmt_buffer;
> +static struct rnd_state rnd_state;
>  
> -typedef int (*check_fn)(const char *file, const int line, const void *check_data,
> -			const char *string, const char *fmt, int n_args, va_list ap);
> +typedef void (*check_fn)(struct kunit *test, const char *file, const int line,
> +			 const void *check_data, const char *string, const char *fmt, int n_args,
> +			 va_list ap);
>  
> -static void __scanf(6, 0) __init
> -_test(const char *file, const int line, check_fn fn, const void *check_data, const char *string,
> -	const char *fmt, int n_args, ...)
> +static void __scanf(7, 0)

This should be:

static void __scanf(7, 9)

Otherwise, the compilation with W=1 produces the warning reported by
the lkp@intel.com kernel test robot, see
https://lore.kernel.org/r/202502160245.KUrryBJR-lkp@intel.com

> +_test(struct kunit *test, const char *file, const int line, check_fn fn, const void *check_data,
> +	const char *string, const char *fmt, int n_args, ...)
>  {
>  	va_list ap, ap_copy;
>  	int ret;

Otherwise, it looks good to me.

With the above fix:

Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

Best Regards,
Petr

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-05 12:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-14 16:19 [PATCH v8 0/4] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit Tamir Duberstein
2025-02-14 16:19 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] scanf: implicate test line in failure messages Tamir Duberstein
2025-03-05  8:55   ` Petr Mladek
2025-03-05  9:56   ` Petr Mladek
2025-03-05 11:35     ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-02-14 16:19 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] scanf: remove redundant debug logs Tamir Duberstein
2025-03-05  8:59   ` Petr Mladek
2025-02-14 16:20 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] scanf: convert self-test to KUnit Tamir Duberstein
2025-02-15 18:50   ` kernel test robot
2025-02-15 19:52     ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-02-16 20:22       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-02-17 14:29         ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-03-05  9:47       ` Petr Mladek
2025-03-05 11:36         ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-03-05 12:46   ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2025-02-14 16:20 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] scanf: break kunit into test cases Tamir Duberstein
2025-03-05 15:01   ` Petr Mladek
2025-03-05 15:25     ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-03-05 15:55       ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-05 15:57         ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-03-05 19:35           ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-03-05 20:09             ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-03-06  9:38           ` Petr Mladek
2025-03-06 10:56             ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-03-05 15:54     ` Andy Shevchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8hHrIz2wwAMtQc8@pathway.suse.cz \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davidgow@google.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tamird@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.