From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
lpieralisi@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org,
daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, james.morse@arm.com, d-gole@ti.com,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
khilman@baylibre.com, quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com,
quic_yuanjiey@quicinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] cpuidle: psci: Init cpuidle only for present CPUs
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 12:42:39 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8mYP7AGBPeDTvXn@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKForY4VNZtqietDPt2FQM3p4OsaoE_oJb0PPLUAh98WsHQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:53:14AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Mar 2025 at 07:17, Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com> wrote:
> >
> > for_each_possible_cpu() is currently used to initialize cpuidle
> > in the PSCI cpuidle driver.
> >
> > However, in cpu_dev_register_generic(), for_each_present_cpu()
> > is used to register CPU devices which means the CPU devices are
> > only registered for present CPUs and not all possible CPUs.
> >
> > With nosmp or maxcpus=0, only the boot CPU is present, leading
> > to the failure:
> >
> > | Failed to register cpuidle device for cpu1
> >
> > Change for_each_possible_cpu() to for_each_present_cpu() in the
> > PSCI cpuidle driver to ensure it only registers cpuidle devices
> > for CPUs that are actually present.
> >
> > Fixes: b0c69e1214bc ("drivers: base: Use present CPUs in GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES")
> > Reviewed-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > Tested-by: Yuanjie Yang <quic_yuanjiey@quicinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>
>
> Is this problem specific to cpuidle-psci?
>
> Others are using for_each_possible_cpu() when registering their cpuidle drivers.
>
Good point. I assumed as this was very old patch, only this is left without
conversion to using present_cpumask. Looks like there are many other drivers
that need similar change. May be PSCI is most commonly used ones these days
and hardly anyone tests with nosmp or maxcpus=1 on those platforms.
But yes, all the users of for_each_possible_cpu() need to move to
for_each_present_cpu() if they are relying on CPU device being registered.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 12:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-06 6:18 [PATCH v3] cpuidle: psci: Init cpuidle only for present CPUs Jacky Bai
2025-03-06 10:53 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-03-06 12:42 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2025-03-07 2:33 ` Jacky Bai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8mYP7AGBPeDTvXn@bogus \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
--cc=quic_tingweiz@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_yuanjiey@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.