From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1418819D8A4 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 07:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741332733; cv=none; b=F8GHjSMEBTxqRPz9SRsx8uZhtSQrEh1ln78rl+t5QSOX3leMDg6DB9miIt1iDVtk67m5vUEDemLeFoczPh1PmdQyYU6koumHsvGVxM6buDIHdgsJKD7UHTjgay6pZ9UP1HVKPTjRY2NZUQdK4bnspOstghA5Wq21nUwmfIs0t3s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741332733; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0n9mnucRi4sYNV486/6Gw1e7LpF2GnO1kkWy7c3sKFk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GBRJD5W6WmrSxi/ZmClJLPxLqyYb/J9RTTElmGe5uhAeD0e6rzGzGYRdkVrjvCIqox+UGbxiOGJdCOrsclzlmqBAjFtIySLUwApsViy4PA3Jwgf/tecINWg9j8MWasmzC5pQOXLCt6ePEDBQ9zOtLpu8YlvoyUHdRzjciSxsKvs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=TXqwYR8o; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="TXqwYR8o" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741332732; x=1772868732; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0n9mnucRi4sYNV486/6Gw1e7LpF2GnO1kkWy7c3sKFk=; b=TXqwYR8oAB0QIDLwXMeqbcPSCWg9PWkkps/iNCFTWy7ZRghc+H4f0sUg UYPdEv+mPeGj8ljVaNZhGJtXAQT+YrF0a6AYVHY9p/WtbISaSYsJLZrKo cO3rL04jS+CjIcoctHbrxECf0wmBcAX8/pnSZuaBBQ4P38TCozVaNuuuv CV0PqgsvgM3/F4kH/1YhgAYiVh5j/+vpvgMZmDYyvQ8FGzzK64EBskgeR ECsFETVZHDh3GxbpNbSiOg+moNFzPtqkvh1WkEeUVpVPejsgce/Wiem4b RSC/PTYvLiFvprULO5vYls10SlL4JcMaN0T4o+jr3Q/uR6qfpbkCloH4G g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Bb6EFEkwRJSExE+H6wh7Pw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: SeJ104yMRMCZ5Cf5ZwXAbQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11365"; a="59931185" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,228,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="59931185" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Mar 2025 23:32:09 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Z1+BL8nvTUqYhVfuIt1Egg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: eTZR0ffEQceqcW7KL2AxEg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.14,228,1736841600"; d="scan'208";a="142483946" Received: from liuzhao-optiplex-7080.sh.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.239.160.39]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Mar 2025 23:32:05 -0800 Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:52:14 +0800 From: Zhao Liu To: dongli.zhang@oracle.com Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, sandipan.das@amd.com, babu.moger@amd.com, likexu@tencent.com, like.xu.linux@gmail.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, groug@kaod.org, khorenko@virtuozzo.com, alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com, den@virtuozzo.com, davydov-max@yandex-team.ru, xiaoyao.li@intel.com, dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com, joe.jin@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] [DO NOT MERGE] kvm: Introduce kvm_arch_pre_create_vcpu() Message-ID: References: <20250302220112.17653-1-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> <20250302220112.17653-4-dongli.zhang@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > I didn't know if I would need to wait until this patch is merged into > mainline QEMU. That's why I didn't add my signed-off. No problem if Xiaoyao is okay with it (copyright of patches need to honor the original author & signed-off). IMO, if your series is accepted first, it also helps to reduce the size of the TDX series, and it helps the subsequent PMU development (like mediated PMU). Conversely, it's also not a big deal; you can simply rebase and remove this patch at that time. Even I'm thinking that my KVM PMU filter should perhaps base on your work. > I will add in v3 and remove "DO NOT MERGE" if the patch isn't in QEMU when > I am sending out v3. Okay. Thanks, Zhao