From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
Cc: intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com, uma.shankar@intel.com,
mika.kahola@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_global_dpll_funcs
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 16:06:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8r9UHTIiz1sagXs@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250225080927.157437-8-suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 01:39:23PM +0530, Suraj Kandpal wrote:
> Change the arguments for enable hook in intel_global_dpll_funcs to only
> accept crtc_state. This is because we really don't need those extra
> arguments everything can be derived from crtc_state and we need
> intel_encoder for PLL enablement when DISPLAY_VER() >= 14.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suraj Kandpal <suraj.kandpal@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 100 ++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> index bd623fdddfdc..c39f7d73a89f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpll_mgr.c
> @@ -66,9 +66,8 @@ struct intel_global_dpll_funcs {
> * Hook for enabling the pll, called from intel_enable_global_dpll() if
> * the pll is not already enabled.
> */
> - void (*enable)(struct intel_display *display,
> - struct intel_global_dpll *pll,
> - const struct intel_dpll_hw_state *dpll_hw_state);
> + void (*enable)(const struct intel_crtc_state *state,
This feels like the wrong direction. We want the plls to be
independent of crtcs. The crtc_state should only be necessary
to compute a plls's state.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-07 14:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-25 8:09 [PATCH 00/11] DPLL framework redesign Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 01/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_state Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 02/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename macro for_each_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 03/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename intel_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 05/11] drm/i915/dpll: Move away from using shared dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:46 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-25 8:54 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-25 9:47 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-25 15:30 ` Jani Nikula
2025-02-27 10:18 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-28 14:26 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-02-28 15:31 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-03-03 12:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-07 12:02 ` Kahola, Mika
2025-03-07 13:06 ` Ville Syrjälä
2025-03-07 13:53 ` Kahola, Mika
2025-03-11 8:12 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 06/11] drm/i915/dpll: Rename crtc_get_shared_dpll Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 07/11] drm/i915/dpll: Change argument for enable hook in intel_global_dpll_funcs Suraj Kandpal
2025-03-07 14:06 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2025-03-11 8:15 ` Kandpal, Suraj
2025-03-11 9:50 ` Kahola, Mika
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 08/11] drm/i915/drm: Rename disable hook in intel_dpll_global_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915/dpll: Introduce new hook in intel_global_dpll_func Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 10/11] drm/i915/dpll: Add intel_encoder argument to get_hw_state hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:09 ` [PATCH 11/11] drm/i915/dpll: Change arguments for get_freq hook Suraj Kandpal
2025-02-25 8:43 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for DPLL framework redesign Patchwork
2025-02-25 8:43 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-25 8:45 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-02-25 9:02 ` ✓ CI.Build: " Patchwork
2025-02-25 9:04 ` ✓ CI.Hooks: " Patchwork
2025-02-25 9:06 ` ✓ CI.checksparse: " Patchwork
2025-02-25 9:26 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-02-25 9:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning " Patchwork
2025-02-25 9:49 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2025-02-25 10:09 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-02-25 15:21 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z8r9UHTIiz1sagXs@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ankit.k.nautiyal@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=mika.kahola@intel.com \
--cc=suraj.kandpal@intel.com \
--cc=uma.shankar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.