All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
To: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
Cc: <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>, <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>,
	<matthew.d.roper@intel.com>, <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] RFC drm/xe: Add configfs to enable survivability mode
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:45:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8sGnSZ-45gd2YWm@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250307142446.1790715-2-riana.tauro@intel.com>

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 07:54:44PM +0530, Riana Tauro wrote:
> Registers a configfs subsystem called 'xe' to userspace. The user can
> use this to modify exposed attributes.
> 
> Add survivability mode attribute (config/xe/survivability_mode) to the
> subsystem to allow the user to specify the card that should enter
> survivability mode.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile      |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h | 12 ++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c   |  5 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h   |  1 +
>  5 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> index 9699b08585f7..3f8c87292cee 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/Makefile
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@ $(obj)/generated/%_wa_oob.c $(obj)/generated/%_wa_oob.h: $(obj)/xe_gen_wa_oob \
>  xe-y += xe_bb.o \
>  	xe_bo.o \
>  	xe_bo_evict.o \
> +	xe_configfs.o \
>  	xe_devcoredump.o \
>  	xe_device.o \
>  	xe_device_sysfs.o \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8c5f248e466d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/configfs.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +
> +#include "xe_configfs.h"
> +#include "xe_module.h"
> +
> +/**
> + * DOC: Xe Configfs
> + *
> + * XE KMD registers a configfs subsystem called 'xe'to userspace that allows users to modify

----->                                                 ^ missing space

> + * the exposed attributes.
> + *
> + * Attributes:
> + *
> + * config/xe/survivability_mode : Write only attribute that allows user to specify the PCI address
> + *				  of the card that has to enter survivability mode
> + */
> +
> +void xe_configfs_clear_survivability_mode(void)
> +{
> +	kfree(xe_modparam.survivability_mode);
> +	xe_modparam.survivability_mode = NULL;

let's avoid xe_modparam, but more about this below...

> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t survivability_mode_store(struct config_item *item, const char *page, size_t len)
> +{
> +	char *survivability_mode;
> +	int ret;
> +	unsigned int domain, bus, slot, function;
> +
> +	ret = sscanf(page, "%04x:%02x:%02x.%x", &domain, &bus, &slot, &function);
> +	if (ret != 4)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	survivability_mode = kstrdup(page, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!survivability_mode)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	xe_configfs_clear_survivability_mode();
> +	xe_modparam.survivability_mode = survivability_mode;
> +
> +	return len;
> +}
> +
> +CONFIGFS_ATTR_WO(, survivability_mode);
> +
> +static struct configfs_attribute *xe_configfs_attrs[] = {
> +	&attr_survivability_mode,
> +	NULL,
> +};
> +
> +static const struct config_item_type xe_config_type = {
> +	.ct_attrs	= xe_configfs_attrs,
> +	.ct_owner	= THIS_MODULE,
> +};
> +
> +static struct configfs_subsystem xe_config_subsys = {
> +	.su_group = {
> +		.cg_item = {
> +			.ci_namebuf = "xe",
> +			.ci_type = &xe_config_type,
> +		},
> +	},
> +};
> +
> +int __init xe_configfs_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	config_group_init(&xe_config_subsys.su_group);
> +	mutex_init(&xe_config_subsys.su_mutex);

That's strange... if we are not using the mutex here,
why do we need to initialize it ourselves?
Why isn't it done inside the config_group_init then?!

> +	ret = configfs_register_subsystem(&xe_config_subsys);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("Error %d while registering subsystem %s\n",
> +		       ret, xe_config_subsys.su_group.cg_item.ci_namebuf);
> +		mutex_destroy(&xe_config_subsys.su_mutex);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void __exit xe_configfs_exit(void)
> +{
> +	xe_configfs_clear_survivability_mode();
> +	configfs_unregister_subsystem(&xe_config_subsys);
> +	mutex_destroy(&xe_config_subsys.su_mutex);
> +}
> +
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..491629a2ca53
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_configfs.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> +/*
> + * Copyright © 2025 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +#ifndef _XE_CONFIGFS_H_
> +#define _XE_CONFIGFS_H_
> +
> +int xe_configfs_init(void);
> +void xe_configfs_exit(void);
> +void xe_configfs_clear_survivability_mode(void);
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> index 475acdba2b55..15b3cf22193c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_module.h>
>  
>  #include "xe_drv.h"
> +#include "xe_configfs.h"
>  #include "xe_hw_fence.h"
>  #include "xe_pci.h"
>  #include "xe_pm.h"
> @@ -91,6 +92,10 @@ static const struct init_funcs init_funcs[] = {
>  	{
>  		.init = xe_check_nomodeset,
>  	},
> +	{
> +		.init = xe_configfs_init,
> +		.exit = xe_configfs_exit,
> +	},
>  	{
>  		.init = xe_hw_fence_module_init,
>  		.exit = xe_hw_fence_module_exit,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h
> index 84339e509c80..c238dbee6bc7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_module.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ struct xe_modparam {
>  #endif
>  	int wedged_mode;
>  	u32 svm_notifier_size;
> +	char *survivability_mode;

We should probably create another struct
struct xe_configfs {
       char *survivability_mode;
}

it could be here or perhaps inside a xe_configfs_types.h
that is imported wherever it is needed.

>  };
>  
>  extern struct xe_modparam xe_modparam;
> -- 
> 2.47.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-07 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-07 14:24 [PATCH 0/2] Add configfs support for survivability mode Riana Tauro
2025-03-07 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] RFC drm/xe: Add configfs to enable " Riana Tauro
2025-03-07 14:45   ` Rodrigo Vivi [this message]
2025-03-07 15:16   ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-10  5:31     ` Riana Tauro
2025-03-10 13:31       ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-10 14:23         ` Riana Tauro
2025-03-10 16:40           ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-03-10 17:01             ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-10 17:14               ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-03-10 21:40                 ` Matt Roper
2025-03-10  7:14   ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-03-13  6:18     ` Riana Tauro
2025-03-13 14:52       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-03-13 19:52         ` Lucas De Marchi
2025-03-14  7:24           ` Riana Tauro
2025-03-14 16:17             ` Aravind Iddamsetty
2025-03-07 14:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] RFC drm/xe: Enable configfs support for " Riana Tauro
2025-03-07 15:01   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2025-03-10  5:36     ` Riana Tauro
2025-03-07 14:36 ` ✓ CI.Patch_applied: success for Add " Patchwork
2025-03-07 14:36 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning " Patchwork
2025-03-07 14:37 ` ✗ CI.KUnit: failure " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8sGnSZ-45gd2YWm@intel.com \
    --to=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
    --cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
    --cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.