Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] test_bits: add tests for BIT_U*()

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 07:11:42PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> On 07/03/2025 at 02:55, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 01:08:15AM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> >> On 06/03/2025 at 22:11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:29:58PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
> >>>> From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@wanadoo.fr>
> >>>>
> >>>> Add some additional tests in lib/test_bits.c to cover the expected
> >>>> results of the fixed type BIT_U*() macros.
> >>>
> >>> Still would be good to have a small assembly test case for GENMASK*() as they
> >>> went split and it will be a good regression test in case somebody decides to
> >>> unify both without much thinking..
> >>
> >> Let me confirm that I correctly understood your ask. Would something
> >> like this meet your expectations?
> > 
> > I believe it should be written in asm.
> 
> I am not confident enough in my assembly skills to submit asm patches to
> the kernel. So, I would rather take a pass on that one.
> 
> Regardless, if somebody decides to unify both without much thinking as
> you said, I am fully confident that the patch will get Nack-ed right

As I said above "would be good", if you think it's not feasible by you, perhaps
a comment (FIXME: ?) in the Kunit test cases that we lack of / need an asm test
as well.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko