All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net>
To: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@sk.com>
Cc: kernel_team@skhynix.com, Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com>,
	harry.yoo@oracle.com, ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rakie.kim@sk.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org,
	dan.j.williams@intel.com, Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com,
	dave.jiang@intel.com, horen.chuang@linux.dev, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@meta.com, yunjeong.mun@sk.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Don't create weight sysfs for memoryless nodes
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 12:51:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z8syE7l5H35pk9T5@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c0d8aa8-cac7-4679-aece-af88e8129345@sk.com>

On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 08:46:46PM +0900, Honggyu Kim wrote:
> You can see more info below.
> 
>   $ cd /sys/devices/system/node
> 
>   $ ls -d node*
>   node0  node1  node2  node3
> 
>   $ cat possible
>   0-11

We're split across two threads now, but i'll add this context

I'm basically asking whether there should be 12 nodes possible. It seems
like there should only be 4 nodes possible - 2 for sockets, 2 for host
bridges.

Unless I'm misunderstanding, it should be the case that a given physical
address can only be hosted by 1 numa node (proximity domain).

So it *should* be the case that you either have 4 nodes possible or 10
nodes possible, not 12.  But I could be missing a piece of context.

> Which command do we need for this info specifically?  My output doesn't
> provide some useful info for that.
> 
>   $ acpidump -b
>   $ iasl -d *
>   $ cat cedt.dsl
>       ...
>   **** Unknown ACPI table signature [CEDT]
>

You probably have an old version of acpidump here, you might need to get
a newer version that knows about the CEDT.

You'll also want to get all the Memory Affinity entries from srat.dsl

> Not sure about it.  This must be fixed ASAP because current kernel is
> broken on this issue and the fix should go into hotfix tree first.
>

I agree something is broken, I'm not convinced what is broken.

> If you can think this is just a bandaid, but leaving it bleeding as is
> not the right approach.
>

This affects userland, we shouldn't thrash on this. Lets get it right.

~Gregory

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-07 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20250228001631.1102-1-yunjeong.mun@sk.com>
2025-02-26 21:35 ` [PATCH 1/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning Joshua Hahn
2025-02-26 21:35   ` [PATCH 2/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Don't create weight sysfs for memoryless nodes Joshua Hahn
2025-02-27  2:32     ` Honggyu Kim
2025-02-27  3:20       ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-03 21:56         ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-04 12:53           ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-03 16:19       ` Gregory Price
2025-03-04 13:03         ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-04 16:16           ` Gregory Price
2025-03-04 16:29       ` Gregory Price
2025-03-06 12:39         ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-06 17:32           ` Gregory Price
2025-03-07 11:46             ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-07 17:51               ` Gregory Price [this message]
2025-03-10 12:26                 ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-10 14:22                   ` Gregory Price
2025-03-11  2:07                     ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-11  2:42                       ` Gregory Price
2025-03-11  4:02                         ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-11  4:42                           ` Gregory Price
2025-03-11  9:51                             ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-11 15:52                               ` Gregory Price
2025-03-18  8:02                             ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-18 11:02                               ` Honggyu Kim
2025-03-18 15:13                                 ` Gregory Price
2025-03-19  9:56                                   ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-19 14:54                                     ` Gregory Price
2025-02-28  0:16   ` [PATCH 1/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Weighted Interleave Auto-tuning yunjeong.mun
2025-02-28  6:39   ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-02-28 16:24     ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-04 21:56     ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-04 22:22       ` Joshua Hahn
2025-03-05  9:49         ` Yunjeong Mun
2025-03-05 16:28           ` Joshua Hahn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z8syE7l5H35pk9T5@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F \
    --to=gourry@gourry.net \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=harry.yoo@oracle.com \
    --cc=honggyu.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=horen.chuang@linux.dev \
    --cc=joshua.hahnjy@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=kernel_team@skhynix.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rakie.kim@sk.com \
    --cc=ying.huang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yunjeong.mun@sk.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.