From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D2C0C282EC for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2025 14:19:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AE380F4C; Sat, 8 Mar 2025 15:19:45 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=disroot.org header.i=@disroot.org header.b="eZnxJqpe"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 345B1809A5; Sat, 8 Mar 2025 15:19:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from layka.disroot.org (layka.disroot.org [178.21.23.139]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEC3080050 for ; Sat, 8 Mar 2025 15:19:41 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=disroot.org Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ziyao@disroot.org Received: from mail01.disroot.lan (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B36E25B88; Sat, 8 Mar 2025 15:19:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from layka.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10024) with ESMTP id f1IDv3w2C4e6; Sat, 8 Mar 2025 15:19:41 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1741443581; bh=JpVohEXp4eneLP7WpxbZ/uD4x4xXMpJhTLN71h/eZlU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=eZnxJqpe88uYDdRgfaegq/fVuyR1d8XiTtGvzpK1el+08dIJHkwPPiZsoDESXTbGb dVNtFRWQRDofZJFGd2YjZ2MzrZl9g+4vUDGZl+3YbII8FQ+9TfXklIL+pMCMqcAW3Q iN9bMiDMaGSHCh0+IfJcR+gEBG2GsDDArVBoLSTPpOwD/UIPzrw8CH6c52qdMtGtoz PgCoCuyiGRQRHPd5pKZvYSVE+J4igbysI/BuoYECiZ9nQK3vYKJKspj6s9PS8yXtgx A4ziVM9Di7GRu8gfZNHttrWJaNESkohZksBOHKw+nXT9MEgbs3KAakkPPFsZkV7Y7u a+4B/JnOBLhDg== Date: Sat, 8 Mar 2025 14:19:26 +0000 From: Yao Zi To: Ali Tariq , u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: Re: Building separate SPL with U-boot Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 03:07:19PM +0500, Ali Tariq wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I am trying to build a separate SPL for u-boot (which would produce a file > named FSBL.bin - first stage boot loader after the build) for testing > purposes. I am using bananapi-f3_defconfig as the config file. iirc U-Boot support for bananapi-f3 is really in an early stage and I don't think U-Boot SPL has been ported to the platform. > But I want to know how to produce a separate SPL for any SoC or board. > > Is there a specific reason why the separate SPL is not built? > > Regards, > Ali Best regards, Yao Zi