From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tests/functional/asset: Fail assert fetch when retries are exceeded
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 08:13:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9FCPL2iucV3KsyG@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250312051739.938441-2-npiggin@gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 03:17:36PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> Currently the fetch code does not fail gracefully when retry limit is
> exceeded, it just falls through the loop with no file, which ends up
> hitting other errors.
>
> In preparation for adding more cases where a download gets retried,
> add an explicit check for retry limit exceeded.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
> ---
> tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py b/tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py
> index f0730695f09..6a1c92ffbef 100644
> --- a/tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py
> +++ b/tests/functional/qemu_test/asset.py
> @@ -116,7 +116,10 @@ def fetch(self):
> self.log.info("Downloading %s to %s...", self.url, self.cache_file)
> tmp_cache_file = self.cache_file.with_suffix(".download")
>
> - for retries in range(3):
> + for retries in range(4):
> + if retries == 3:
> + raise Exception("Retries exceeded downloading %s", self.url)
While it works, it feels a bit wierd to me. Given the error retry
scenario will unlink the file, I think it would be better todo
if not os.path.exists(tmp_cache_file)
raise Exception(...)
immediately after the for() loop
> +
> try:
> with tmp_cache_file.open("xb") as dst:
> with urllib.request.urlopen(self.url) as resp:
> --
> 2.47.1
>
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-12 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-12 5:17 [PATCH 0/3] tests/functional/asset: improve partial-download handling Nicholas Piggin
2025-03-12 5:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] tests/functional/asset: Fail assert fetch when retries are exceeded Nicholas Piggin
2025-03-12 6:40 ` Thomas Huth
2025-03-12 8:13 ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2025-03-12 5:17 ` [PATCH 2/3] tests/functional/asset: Verify downloaded size Nicholas Piggin
2025-03-12 6:49 ` Thomas Huth
2025-03-12 5:17 ` [PATCH 3/3] tests/functional/asset: Add AssetError exception class Nicholas Piggin
2025-03-12 6:56 ` Thomas Huth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9FCPL2iucV3KsyG@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=philmd@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.