All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"Doug Goldstein" <cardoe@cardoe.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Oleksii Kurochko" <oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com>,
	"Mykola Kvach" <xakep.amatop@gmail.com>,
	"Mykyta Poturai" <mykyta_poturai@epam.com>
Subject: Re: S3 regression on AMD in 4.20 (was: Re: [PATCH] ci: add yet another HW runner)
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 00:53:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9TBaEeUcVrjaACL@mail-itl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9SsYF0pYTkZXg9I@mail-itl>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2869 bytes --]

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 11:23:28PM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 02:19:19PM -0700, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Mar 2025, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
> > > This is AMD Zen2 (Ryzen 5 4500U specifically), in a HP Probook 445 G7.
> > > 
> > > This one has working S3, so add a test for it here.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Marek Marczykowski-Górecki <marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com>
> > > ---
> > > Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> > > Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
> > > 
> > > The suspend test added here currently fails on staging[1], but passes on
> > > staging-4.19[2]. So the regression wants fixing before committing this
> > > patch.
> > >
> > > [1] https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/marmarek/xen/-/jobs/9408437140
> > > [2] https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/marmarek/xen/-/jobs/9408943441
> > 
> > We could commit the patch now without the s3 test.
> > 
> > I don't know what the x86 maintainers think about fixing the suspend
> > bug, but one idea would be to run a bisection between 4.20 and 4.19.
> 
> I'm on it already, but it's annoying. Lets convert this thread to
> discussion about the issue:
> 
> So, I bisected it between staging-4.19 and master. The breakage is
> somewhere between (inclusive):
> eb21ce14d709 x86/boot: Rewrite EFI/MBI2 code partly in C
> and
> 47990ecef286 x86/boot: Improve MBI2 structure check
> 
> But, the first one breaks booting on this system and it remains broken
> until the second commit (or its parent) - at which point S3 is already
> broken. So, there is a range of 71 commits that may be responsible...
> 
> But then, based on a matrix chat and Jan's observation I've tried
> reverting f75780d26b2f "xen: move per-cpu area management into common
> code" just on top of 47990ecef286, and that fixed suspend.
> Applying "xen/percpu: don't initialize percpu on resume" on top of
> 47990ecef286 fixes suspend too.
> But applying it on top of master
> (91772f8420dfa2fcfe4db68480c216db5b79c512 specifically) does not fix it,
> but the failure mode is different than without the patch - system resets
> on S3 resume, with no crash message on the serial console (even with
> sync_console), instead of hanging.
> And one more data point: reverting f75780d26b2f on top of master is the
> same as applying "xen/percpu: don't initialize percpu on resume" on
> master - system reset on S3 resume.
> So, it looks like there are more issues...

Another bisection round and I have the second culprit:

    8e60d47cf011 x86/iommu: avoid MSI address and data writes if IRT index hasn't changed

With master+"xen/percpu: don't initialize percpu on resume"+revert of
8e60d47cf011 suspend works again on this AMD system.

-- 
Best Regards,
Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
Invisible Things Lab

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-14 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-14  3:06 [PATCH] ci: add yet another HW runner Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2025-03-14 21:19 ` Stefano Stabellini
2025-03-14 22:23   ` S3 regression on AMD in 4.20 (was: Re: [PATCH] ci: add yet another HW runner) Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2025-03-14 23:53     ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki [this message]
2025-03-15  0:02       ` S3 regression on AMD in 4.20 Andrew Cooper
2025-03-17 15:56         ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-17 16:11           ` Jan Beulich
2025-03-17 17:38             ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-18  6:24               ` Jan Beulich
2025-03-18  8:25                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-17 16:35           ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2025-03-17 17:35             ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-17 17:54               ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2025-03-18  8:31                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2025-03-31 13:16   ` [PATCH] ci: add yet another HW runner Marek Marczykowski-Górecki
2025-03-31 13:45     ` Andrew Cooper
2025-03-31 13:47       ` Marek Marczykowski-Górecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z9TBaEeUcVrjaACL@mail-itl \
    --to=marmarek@invisiblethingslab.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=cardoe@cardoe.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=mykyta_poturai@epam.com \
    --cc=oleksii.kurochko@gmail.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xakep.amatop@gmail.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.