From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bmailout1.hostsharing.net (bmailout1.hostsharing.net [83.223.95.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2956183CA6; Sat, 15 Mar 2025 14:37:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=83.223.95.100 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742049466; cv=none; b=Eicp84ruyDwfsf6qQMIztiXMo6AA3ehwP6MD8nBUZTQD9m7TqduwD9wyFvY0E2nyc488xICzn6V9IH2C4PtC/SgZF+I7pRhprlTIXnmkFFooYTCpc98XWKA3cHk9HtzLSl69/8F4q98kSXpbJKOTFs1faZTc58J/HQoA2m2VUBQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742049466; c=relaxed/simple; bh=jpADu190tb8714QcgIjuTGFjpKfdzkZjJmaLP5umKFQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=kk5WhxFWXCtxHl6xlAPnDRJNJUVVWS8V4Su2QNumIlv9iPp+SVUAiNrXUsZfBb8BHQSBfNip06q5Z2DlT0BA6yG8aV12ksQ3Y8aMszKnp5lTWzOLsP/rNUvaBDUJzMsB3+arf7LoBiDhvx0ryfLlrzr8DRN+zrUh6W5Va7q+UTg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wunner.de; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=h08.hostsharing.net; arc=none smtp.client-ip=83.223.95.100 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=wunner.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=h08.hostsharing.net Received: from h08.hostsharing.net (h08.hostsharing.net [83.223.95.28]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.hostsharing.net", Issuer "RapidSSL TLS RSA CA G1" (verified OK)) by bmailout1.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA8A2300002A5; Sat, 15 Mar 2025 15:37:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by h08.hostsharing.net (Postfix, from userid 100393) id B48BE1D667; Sat, 15 Mar 2025 15:37:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 15:37:40 +0100 From: Lukas Wunner To: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Stefan Berger , Vitaly Chikunov Cc: David Howells , Ignat Korchagin , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] crypto: ecdsa - Fix enc/dec size reported by KEYCTL_PKEY_QUERY Message-ID: References: <3d74d6134f4f87a90ebe0a37cb06c6ec144ceef7.1738521533.git.lukas@wunner.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: keyrings@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3d74d6134f4f87a90ebe0a37cb06c6ec144ceef7.1738521533.git.lukas@wunner.de> Hi Herbert, patches [3/4] and [4/4] of this series have not been applied and are marked "Changes Requested" in patchwork... https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-crypto/patch/3d74d6134f4f87a90ebe0a37cb06c6ec144ceef7.1738521533.git.lukas@wunner.de/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-crypto/patch/c9d465b449b6ba2e4a59b3480119076ba1138ded.1738521533.git.lukas@wunner.de/ ...however it's unclear to me what needs to be changed in order to make them acceptable. I think the objection was that asymmetric keys need to be maintained, but that's since been addressed. Are there further objections? Should I resend? Thanks! Lukas