From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf trace: Implement syscall summary in BPF
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2025 17:23:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9YaApKiGTkuudi8@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH0uvoi0fqm-jJcw2VtLwHbSrcKUq__UW82oCMLaKEH7Fz-zhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Howard,
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 05:57:33PM -0800, Howard Chu wrote:
> Hello Namhyung,
>
> Sorry for replying this crazy late, flu got me good last week...
I'm also late. :) Hope you are well now.
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 10:32 AM Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > When --summary-only option is used, it doesn't need (augmented) arguments
> > of syscalls. Let's skip the augmentation and load another small BPF
> > program to collect the statistics in the kernel instead of copying the
> > data to the ring-buffer to calculate the stats in userspace. This will
> > be much more light-weight than the existing approach and remove any lost
> > events.
>
> Yep, awesome idea, 100% agree. That's how the summary mode should be
> written, so cool :)
>
> >
> > For simplicity, it's only activated with --summary-mode=total in system-
> > wide mode. And it also skips to calculate stddev as doing it atomically
> > would add more overheads (i.e. requiring a spinlock). It can be extended
> > to cover more use cases later, if needed.
> >
> > Cc: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/perf/Makefile.perf | 2 +-
> > tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 41 ++++--
> > tools/perf/util/Build | 1 +
> > tools/perf/util/bpf-trace-summary.c | 117 ++++++++++++++++++
> > .../perf/util/bpf_skel/syscall_summary.bpf.c | 109 ++++++++++++++++
> > tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/syscall_summary.h | 18 +++
> > tools/perf/util/trace.h | 31 +++++
> > 7 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/bpf-trace-summary.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/syscall_summary.bpf.c
> > create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/syscall_summary.h
> > create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/trace.h
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> > index 55d6ce9ea52fb2a5..3b68a57682ca991d 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> > +++ b/tools/perf/Makefile.perf
> > @@ -1198,7 +1198,7 @@ SKELETONS += $(SKEL_OUT)/bperf_leader.skel.h $(SKEL_OUT)/bperf_follower.skel.h
> > SKELETONS += $(SKEL_OUT)/bperf_cgroup.skel.h $(SKEL_OUT)/func_latency.skel.h
> > SKELETONS += $(SKEL_OUT)/off_cpu.skel.h $(SKEL_OUT)/lock_contention.skel.h
> > SKELETONS += $(SKEL_OUT)/kwork_trace.skel.h $(SKEL_OUT)/sample_filter.skel.h
> > -SKELETONS += $(SKEL_OUT)/kwork_top.skel.h
> > +SKELETONS += $(SKEL_OUT)/kwork_top.skel.h $(SKEL_OUT)/syscall_summary.skel.h
> > SKELETONS += $(SKEL_OUT)/bench_uprobe.skel.h
> > SKELETONS += $(SKEL_OUT)/augmented_raw_syscalls.skel.h
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > index f55a8a6481f27f99..1c7af7583bc560c4 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c
> > @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@
> > #include "util/thread_map.h"
> > #include "util/stat.h"
> > #include "util/tool.h"
> > +#include "util/trace.h"
> > #include "util/util.h"
> > #include "trace/beauty/beauty.h"
> > #include "trace-event.h"
> > @@ -222,6 +223,7 @@ struct trace {
> > bool force;
> > bool vfs_getname;
> > bool force_btf;
> > + bool summary_bpf;
> > int trace_pgfaults;
> > char *perfconfig_events;
> > struct {
> > @@ -4276,6 +4278,13 @@ static int trace__run(struct trace *trace, int argc, const char **argv)
> >
> > trace->live = true;
> >
> > + if (trace->summary_bpf) {
> > + if (trace_prepare_bpf_summary() < 0)
> > + goto out_delete_evlist;
> > +
> > + goto create_maps;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (!trace->raw_augmented_syscalls) {
> > if (trace->trace_syscalls && trace__add_syscall_newtp(trace))
> > goto out_error_raw_syscalls;
> > @@ -4334,6 +4343,7 @@ static int trace__run(struct trace *trace, int argc, const char **argv)
> > if (trace->cgroup)
> > evlist__set_default_cgroup(trace->evlist, trace->cgroup);
> >
> > +create_maps:
> > err = evlist__create_maps(evlist, &trace->opts.target);
> > if (err < 0) {
> > fprintf(trace->output, "Problems parsing the target to trace, check your options!\n");
> > @@ -4426,9 +4436,11 @@ static int trace__run(struct trace *trace, int argc, const char **argv)
> > if (err < 0)
> > goto out_error_apply_filters;
> >
> > - err = evlist__mmap(evlist, trace->opts.mmap_pages);
> > - if (err < 0)
> > - goto out_error_mmap;
> > + if (!trace->summary_bpf) {
> > + err = evlist__mmap(evlist, trace->opts.mmap_pages);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + goto out_error_mmap;
> > + }
> >
> > if (!target__none(&trace->opts.target) && !trace->opts.target.initial_delay)
> > evlist__enable(evlist);
>
> I think if summary_bpf is true we don't need to enable the evlist
> either, but we can leave it here.
Probably. I think I just wanted to make minimal changes to the existing
code if possible.
>
> > @@ -4441,6 +4453,9 @@ static int trace__run(struct trace *trace, int argc, const char **argv)
> > evlist__enable(evlist);
> > }
> >
> > + if (trace->summary_bpf)
> > + trace_start_bpf_summary();
> > +
> > trace->multiple_threads = perf_thread_map__pid(evlist->core.threads, 0) == -1 ||
> > perf_thread_map__nr(evlist->core.threads) > 1 ||
> > evlist__first(evlist)->core.attr.inherit;
> > @@ -4508,12 +4523,17 @@ static int trace__run(struct trace *trace, int argc, const char **argv)
> >
> > evlist__disable(evlist);
> >
> > + if (trace->summary_bpf)
> > + trace_end_bpf_summary();
> > +
> > if (trace->sort_events)
> > ordered_events__flush(&trace->oe.data, OE_FLUSH__FINAL);
> >
> > if (!err) {
> > if (trace->summary) {
> > - if (trace->summary_mode == SUMMARY__BY_TOTAL)
> > + if (trace->summary_bpf)
> > + trace_print_bpf_summary(trace->sctbl, trace->output);
> > + else if (trace->summary_mode == SUMMARY__BY_TOTAL)
> > trace__fprintf_total_summary(trace, trace->output);
> > else
> > trace__fprintf_thread_summary(trace, trace->output);
> > @@ -4529,6 +4549,7 @@ static int trace__run(struct trace *trace, int argc, const char **argv)
> > }
> >
> > out_delete_evlist:
> > + trace_cleanup_bpf_summary();
> > delete_syscall_stats(trace->syscall_stats);
> > trace__symbols__exit(trace);
> > evlist__free_syscall_tp_fields(evlist);
> > @@ -5446,6 +5467,15 @@ int cmd_trace(int argc, const char **argv)
> > goto skip_augmentation;
> > }
> >
> > + if (!argc && target__none(&trace.opts.target))
> > + trace.opts.target.system_wide = true;
> > +
> > + if (trace.summary_only && trace.opts.target.system_wide &&
> > + trace.summary_mode == SUMMARY__BY_TOTAL && !trace.trace_pgfaults) {
>
> I feel like trace_pgfaults can coexist with the BPF summary, but I'm
> fine with the current logic.
>
> BTW, this part of the code can be confusing; You covered a case where:
> sudo ./perf trace -s --summary-mode=total -F all -a --syscall
> is handled properly. Because normally when doing
> sudo ./perf trace -s --summary-mode=total -F all -a
> without the --syscall option, perf trace won't even get to this point,
> it will skip augmentation from here:
> if (!trace.trace_syscalls)
> goto skip_augmentation;
>
> So, good work!
I feel like I'd add an option to turn it on explicitly and support
per-task summary as well.
Maybe something like --bpf-summary?
>
> > + trace.summary_bpf = true;
> > + goto skip_augmentation;
> > + }
> > +
> > trace.skel = augmented_raw_syscalls_bpf__open();
> > if (!trace.skel) {
> > pr_debug("Failed to open augmented syscalls BPF skeleton");
> > @@ -5649,9 +5679,6 @@ int cmd_trace(int argc, const char **argv)
> > goto out_close;
> > }
> >
> > - if (!argc && target__none(&trace.opts.target))
> > - trace.opts.target.system_wide = true;
> > -
> > if (input_name)
> > err = trace__replay(&trace);
> > else
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
> > index 034a6603d5a8e8b0..ba4201a6f3c69753 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/Build
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
> > @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ perf-util-$(CONFIG_PERF_BPF_SKEL) += bpf_off_cpu.o
> > perf-util-$(CONFIG_PERF_BPF_SKEL) += bpf-filter.o
> > perf-util-$(CONFIG_PERF_BPF_SKEL) += bpf-filter-flex.o
> > perf-util-$(CONFIG_PERF_BPF_SKEL) += bpf-filter-bison.o
> > +perf-util-$(CONFIG_PERF_BPF_SKEL) += bpf-trace-summary.o
> > perf-util-$(CONFIG_PERF_BPF_SKEL) += btf.o
> >
> > ifeq ($(CONFIG_LIBTRACEEVENT),y)
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf-trace-summary.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf-trace-summary.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000..7e8b1c9b3faeee4f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf-trace-summary.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +#include <inttypes.h>
> > +#include <stdio.h>
> > +#include <stdlib.h>
> > +
> > +#include "syscalltbl.h"
> > +#include "util/trace.h"
> > +#include "util/util.h"
> > +#include <bpf/bpf.h>
> > +#include <linux/time64.h>
> > +
> > +#include "bpf_skel/syscall_summary.h"
> > +#include "bpf_skel/syscall_summary.skel.h"
> > +
> > +
> > +static struct syscall_summary_bpf *skel;
> > +
> > +int trace_prepare_bpf_summary(void)
> > +{
> > + skel = syscall_summary_bpf__open_and_load();
> > + if (skel == NULL) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, "failed to load syscall summary bpf skeleton\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (syscall_summary_bpf__attach(skel) < 0) {
> > + fprintf(stderr, "failed to attach syscall summary bpf skeleton\n");
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void trace_start_bpf_summary(void)
> > +{
> > + skel->bss->enabled = 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void trace_end_bpf_summary(void)
> > +{
> > + skel->bss->enabled = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct syscall_data {
> > + int syscall_nr;
> > + struct syscall_stats stats;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int datacmp(const void *a, const void *b)
> > +{
> > + const struct syscall_data *sa = a;
> > + const struct syscall_data *sb = b;
> > +
> > + return sa->stats.total_time > sb->stats.total_time ? -1 : 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int trace_print_bpf_summary(struct syscalltbl *sctbl, FILE *fp)
> > +{
> > + struct syscall_key *prev_key, key;
> > + struct syscall_data *data = NULL;
> > + struct bpf_map *map = skel->maps.syscall_stats_map;
> > + int nr_data = 0;
> > + int printed = 0;
> > +
> > + /* get stats from the bpf map */
> > + prev_key = NULL;
> > + while (!bpf_map__get_next_key(map, prev_key, &key, sizeof(key))) {
> > + struct syscall_stats stat;
> > +
> > + if (!bpf_map__lookup_elem(map, &key, sizeof(key), &stat, sizeof(stat), 0)) {
> > + struct syscall_data *tmp, *pos;
> > +
> > + tmp = realloc(data, sizeof(*data) * (nr_data + 1));
> > + if (tmp == NULL)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + data = tmp;
> > + pos = &data[nr_data++];
> > +
> > + pos->syscall_nr = key.nr;
> > + memcpy(&pos->stats, &stat, sizeof(stat));
> > + }
> > +
> > + prev_key = &key;
> > + }
> > +
> > + qsort(data, nr_data, sizeof(*data), datacmp);
> > +
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, "\n");
> > +
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, " syscall calls errors total min avg max stddev\n");
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, " (msec) (msec) (msec) (msec) (%%)\n");
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, " --------------- -------- ------ -------- --------- --------- --------- ------\n");
> > +
> > + for (int i = 0; i < nr_data; i++) {
> > + struct syscall_data *pos = &data[i];
> > + double total = (double)(pos->stats.total_time) / NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> > + double min = (double)(pos->stats.min_time) / NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> > + double max = (double)(pos->stats.max_time) / NSEC_PER_MSEC;
> > + double avg = total / pos->stats.count;
> > +
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, " %-15s", syscalltbl__name(sctbl, pos->syscall_nr));
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, " %8u %6u %9.3f %9.3f %9.3f %9.3f %9.2f%%\n",
> > + pos->stats.count, pos->stats.error, total, min, avg, max,
> > + /*stddev=*/0.0);
>
> Assuming the performance downfall comes from libc's sqrt(), isn't it
> calculated only after collecting all the data? And don't we have at
> most nr_data records to process? I fail to understand how they "add
> more overheads", can you please explain?
I thought we should do the same with update_stats() in util/stat.c
and do the rest of calculation for stddev in userspace.
void update_stats(struct stats *stats, u64 val)
{
double delta;
stats->n++;
delta = val - stats->mean;
stats->mean += delta / stats->n;
stats->M2 += delta*(val - stats->mean);
if (val > stats->max)
stats->max = val;
if (val < stats->min)
stats->min = val;
}
Then I thought n, mean and M2 should be protected in a lock.
But it may be ok to allow small inaccuracies without locks.
I'll update it.
>
> > + }
> > +
> > + printed += fprintf(fp, "\n\n");
> > + free(data);
> > +
> > + return printed;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void trace_cleanup_bpf_summary(void)
> > +{
> > + syscall_summary_bpf__destroy(skel);
> > +}
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/syscall_summary.bpf.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/syscall_summary.bpf.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000..e573ce39de73eaf3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/syscall_summary.bpf.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Trace raw_syscalls tracepoints to collect system call statistics.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "vmlinux.h"
> > +#include "syscall_summary.h"
> > +
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
> > +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
> > +
> > +/* This is to calculate a delta between sys-enter and sys-exit for each thread */
> > +struct syscall_trace {
> > + int nr; /* syscall number is only available at sys-enter */
> > + int unused;
> > + u64 timestamp;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#define MAX_ENTRIES (16 * 1024)
> > +
> > +struct syscall_trace_map {
> > + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
> > + __type(key, int); /* tid */
> > + __type(value, struct syscall_trace);
> > + __uint(max_entries, MAX_ENTRIES);
> > +} syscall_trace_map SEC(".maps");
> > +
> > +struct syscall_stats_map {
> > + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
> > + __type(key, struct syscall_key);
> > + __type(value, struct syscall_stats);
> > + __uint(max_entries, MAX_ENTRIES);
> > +} syscall_stats_map SEC(".maps");
> > +
> > +int enabled; /* controlled from userspace */
> > +
> > +static void update_stats(int nr, s64 duration, long ret)
> > +{
> > + struct syscall_key key = { .nr = nr, };
> > + struct syscall_stats *stats;
> > +
> > + stats = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&syscall_stats_map, &key);
> > + if (stats == NULL) {
> > + struct syscall_stats zero = {};
> > +
> > + bpf_map_update_elem(&syscall_stats_map, &key, &zero, BPF_NOEXIST);
> > + stats = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&syscall_stats_map, &key);
> > + if (stats == NULL)
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + __sync_fetch_and_add(&stats->count, 1);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + __sync_fetch_and_add(&stats->error, 1);
> > +
> > + if (duration > 0) {
> > + __sync_fetch_and_add(&stats->total_time, duration);
> > + if (stats->max_time < duration)
> > + stats->max_time = duration;
> > + if (stats->min_time > duration || stats->min_time == 0)
> > + stats->min_time = duration;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return;
> > +}
> > +
> > +SEC("tp_btf/sys_enter")
> > +int sys_enter(u64 *ctx)
> > +{
> > + int tid;
> > + struct syscall_trace st;
> > +
> > + if (!enabled)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + st.nr = ctx[1]; /* syscall number */
> > + st.unused = 0;
> > + st.timestamp = bpf_ktime_get_ns();
> > +
> > + tid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid();
> > + bpf_map_update_elem(&syscall_trace_map, &tid, &st, BPF_ANY);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +SEC("tp_btf/sys_exit")
> > +int sys_exit(u64 *ctx)
> > +{
> > + int tid;
> > + long ret = ctx[1]; /* return value of the syscall */
> > + struct syscall_trace *st;
> > + s64 delta;
> > +
> > + if (!enabled)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + tid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid();
> > + st = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&syscall_trace_map, &tid);
> > + if (st == NULL)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + delta = bpf_ktime_get_ns() - st->timestamp;
>
> Do you think we can do bpf_ktime_get_ns() a little earlier, say before
> bpf_map_lookup_elem()? Although the difference will be tiny...
Right, also it'd be unnecessary if the lookup returns nothing.
Thanks,
Namhyung
>
>
> > + update_stats(st->nr, delta, ret);
> > +
> > + bpf_map_delete_elem(&syscall_trace_map, &tid);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/syscall_summary.h b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/syscall_summary.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000..644dc7049377147e
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_skel/syscall_summary.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > +/* Data structures shared between BPF and tools. */
> > +#ifndef UTIL_BPF_SKEL_SYSCALL_SUMMARY_H
> > +#define UTIL_BPF_SKEL_SYSCALL_SUMMARY_H
> > +
> > +struct syscall_key {
> > + int nr;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct syscall_stats {
> > + u64 total_time;
> > + u64 max_time;
> > + u64 min_time;
> > + u32 count;
> > + u32 error;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#endif /* UTIL_BPF_SKEL_SYSCALL_SUMMARY_H */
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/trace.h b/tools/perf/util/trace.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000000..4d7a7c4544d94caf
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/trace.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> > +#ifndef UTIL_TRACE_H
> > +#define UTIL_TRACE_H
> > +
> > +#include <stdio.h> /* for FILE */
> > +
> > +struct syscalltbl;
> > +
> > +#ifdef HAVE_BPF_SKEL
> > +
> > +int trace_prepare_bpf_summary(void);
> > +void trace_start_bpf_summary(void);
> > +void trace_end_bpf_summary(void);
> > +int trace_print_bpf_summary(struct syscalltbl *sctbl, FILE *fp);
> > +void trace_cleanup_bpf_summary(void);
> > +
> > +#else /* !HAVE_BPF_SKEL */
> > +
> > +static inline int trace_prepare_bpf_summary(void) { return -1; }
> > +static inline void trace_start_bpf_summary(void) {}
> > +static inline void trace_end_bpf_summary(void) {}
> > +static inline int trace_print_bpf_summary(struct syscalltbl *sctbl __maybe_unused,
> > + FILE *fp __maybe_unused)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +static inline void trace_cleanup_bpf_summary(void) {}
> > +
> > +#endif /* HAVE_BPF_SKEL */
> > +
> > +#endif /* UTIL_TRACE_H */
> > --
> > 2.48.1.601.g30ceb7b040-goog
> >
>
> Awesome patch :)
>
> Thanks,
> Howard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-16 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-21 18:32 [PATCH] perf trace: Implement syscall summary in BPF Namhyung Kim
2025-02-24 18:13 ` Ian Rogers
2025-02-25 2:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2025-02-25 4:43 ` Ian Rogers
2025-03-07 1:57 ` Howard Chu
2025-03-16 0:23 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9YaApKiGTkuudi8@google.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=howardchu95@gmail.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.