From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78A1B1863E for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2025 10:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742122040; cv=none; b=JQUFUPL8WJywe41O8jr5R5axKg6ZfS75vpi8e3mQO07SXPuWF50XuVrcsHoQFo0RP7pFlVsPrItytnLkYaxJ+LsbckYzRCmtTf7sz3TKW7PLtg/Kzw2PiNKiPjn39ij+mcIuTldwBYyztkqS/8fH2D2vxmpYlANXBW+6WWz3KLo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742122040; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hXyLp3/t4fJFFU8lybKRdTO/SUlAWwMutkfxcLi3+xM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gOJgC/S0mvjX9Aou0Fe3j6zqYZR11+lV9/hXGiyWVtyJ178yiscb2czBJI9MzB4sRiN7gIQ2RIMl/TTZxXahKvtVyfV1eQmEeWeqeiff1xOePPjocBIZbqFcjGyUon76WvZQmldHvNhXqS0LRuEgbG0LDT+YsrS+Gln12kvxDNI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=BoT5ngFc; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="BoT5ngFc" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=hXyL p3/t4fJFFU8lybKRdTO/SUlAWwMutkfxcLi3+xM=; b=BoT5ngFciF61OB6tuJe/ zQCFLrXTdXkeU3KsipSm5TVBldzDH2DTKbvToTqBIHl355jY4LY5ap7S5Fr5DLH4 b5AZAh2zBUH2LPjH+INXbCS0TZX8wzrSGoy0OW183iWCSX2XW+UZhQClYObEhzL+ LRWQfz2QC2PHli2ak8i3Fr6S8rFwXCMM+lBljAXr/svoDaboHyCEjc0a+EIXQCs/ 8uHJYBp2hfS91Fx830w1hHt1my2bpSuBDsNAhu/iBS5cMyJqfFgwXjgywnDoXcUV FIqAdhBWxsaPeW869IA/V5XdiuxcaQ0hcuSXW4S8lotEJIm+RaW0qHN9dAqkXeRC Xw== Received: (qmail 2664548 invoked from network); 16 Mar 2025 11:47:05 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 16 Mar 2025 11:47:05 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@a/p2ZHMw2M0ujnuL Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2025 11:47:04 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: make use of debugfs_init callback Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Laurent Pinchart , Dmitry Baryshkov , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20250315201651.7339-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> <20250316094042.GB29719@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uCOmUinykMQcIgmN" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250316094042.GB29719@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> --uCOmUinykMQcIgmN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Just to make sure: there can only be one bridge, right? Because the > > suggested name is not unique. >=20 > Bridges can be chained. It's highly unlikely that a chain would contain > multiple bridges of the same model, as that would be quite pointless, > but in theory it could happen. Thanks for the input, Laurent. I suggest to keep the unique name then. --uCOmUinykMQcIgmN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmfWrCUACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbkpA/+PiDYP8ftwHVQ3yphrpYxq9ssEIVfn75gZixWL+Ji2kdbRypF2zcPDxAu nglnA+ucHEyuJ9vWvvnT//MPN3rDrzojgNyEYsrUtFB3CZpGd2QFhNaZzaNzfA82 dBTjOLwg37TjmPtXhOHetks6IvWsaE044+1chfZzOBbedIL9Lq8JFtgGp5d9LHSK P+dm1BS0dXONGC9HsBrzfLEFf21fGbcxJzUliXfDz8d9HXcsnyjAgaKgel6CB0IM gqtQjC1HHsyCdwUEc8pkhHcRKN0yfLEZUh97OQgxTdUDS9WDTPHqAK5YFJ1re/aV 3LY6XPXSEku07Ow82v+UGp/ssWXGulfdG8D/Sv+u8aql2BzeT+41kAQObdrYqpuP 1fl+pUJwdjpBe9VXbAA3qYoG58g7Czb6VWZkSmAFMlTY5fnCxuHUpIHiHgaATr9p b/H1qdQLgcvSPcEq7yMiz+czrzIaImTsLOqXxxV2FrNfgMxFlnisb7cTF28Saft1 abeuCj6I3Banmz7KzJalbzyca12tD2yCDZjy5V4VWmvD/wCNh2fcug21AqB96xQ2 5hHaDK2JvnGixCg1unrdK3AfUPj9D5xzCb3NWKK15i+t2zfqq3F6ZQvJsZd/Bf6h +1LrOSno40j8RZt2Ur6GH57u3j0u9lcvKVSJCSBaLK8qxe39X8Y= =nnSk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uCOmUinykMQcIgmN--