From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D57A186295 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 15:55:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742226947; cv=none; b=P4gA/26CMjv3cHpse1NOfhD5CvJf3ce8gZZMps50SAwT4S1E8OVyjsKqv7zLCAR4P5h8EohlyTfiKlcpHUhXgtvMK7E4NXUv4RtGandR3cHgCXH6gndMXu/3mxYZN7e1k3OhBMIcMLBC4v/02Uwx8RzhENgAMHTPX4bw6H85qrY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742226947; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Z7ysF6S5KXW8XWkkW5d8Lagsv0FjEmOs1Y7sol16u5A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LSVH8Y9CoPU693rHS0xHDwdCMgyqa5dwpC/rVE1k9Srxe/tDCoIYI4ZNcvXFCXcAHzxm2XInFBQ1E7TRiVWhDl2NfzpC+fVJ+YfR2Q/ac6zU4zlb/bxNFMo/GTLfmZqkVSXIqyKAvNmHjZBTazSspFSC9waCzv79/GmNpJ/afvQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=hIW1HKqD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="hIW1HKqD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=Z7ys F6S5KXW8XWkkW5d8Lagsv0FjEmOs1Y7sol16u5A=; b=hIW1HKqDR59ZAH5SKB29 L6E1UpYNu5UF8tXqmiNZolBTHhJaZ59Zv4/A67+kwgtMqbG3LnlHbaksjuz9eSjl XUCuaF4ofJHeRKq+58SCARi+RP8YhlGmulgFGyuCBn31tJ08IDkEGh9cAfn7jS3N i/BC3Y0RkKJ4NKzHl9NVaikTOZ/GF3oLPBOAf+PJQT7b1LFsXAM5bxbXHRoaK/a/ JX3+niUO+rUUrGPgKRNBQA7XaKS5EI64Rv0FGn4l9h8a2LxR1/Gm1Eoj3HccChqt WapGn5tPu5IeVjFPfpog+WQtgGp6IXy7vD8BsXtX3D8Z7YfXkMowpFJJQR0+xpRv ZQ== Received: (qmail 3243644 invoked from network); 17 Mar 2025 16:55:39 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 17 Mar 2025 16:55:39 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@oZvX0YswaqAujnuL Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:55:39 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Doug Anderson Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Phong Hoang , Jacopo Mondi , Laurent Pinchart , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86: Check bridge connection failure Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Doug Anderson , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Phong Hoang , Jacopo Mondi , Laurent Pinchart , Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20250314224202.13128-2-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wXQQzUSsR/l35gkf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --wXQQzUSsR/l35gkf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > where leaving the dangling devices isn't really a problem. For > instance: if somehow you fail to link up to a MIPI source then it > feels OK that the GPIO / PWM and DP-AUX bus parts of the bridge > continue to dangle. You can still use them, right? Ok, convinced. Thanks for the input. Will send another version. --wXQQzUSsR/l35gkf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmfYRfcACgkQFA3kzBSg KbY6OQ/8C6kKQ8ZMv2KNRujKu5AkOWHGUoveNYv7CZEkZgrPFJTYub2zGj10G0ki 3QClhwTlnpc+/yN55kMSQ1hdJSX0/QQyhifZOrqN8urfyFv9lrvYh96sGpWpKeUz uv05/dbugyjBg5FW8echeSBACLaEnDs/EeL7pk08d4gqwvSdgZkcfCrJaPO2XRKc W5QTF5sG8cSeMM8twHMrmTSZumL5s2iuGNjYKE+p2RN2itrtCAfZ0hIsEfBdvT6Z QCaIGyCfFPqkYeqKs+/eMvaPhPGc+hII3D4OhMm6wLGKxB+nYf2Wvh6VZfji4mrC PKbeiyppIfw3hXr+GvtNsoQbZpXxE8VQW7QmFFMgLkmwpAoeat2vOgzf01BFUh/L h4oM65Nscgpq/gXPVd7n+AGms938PMk3IVv5wbWfJYusjULM9UrRWdKRsS2N6tJP nhud3qvIbkBQ3ct757tnjZGclbmGp6F0OOTbyfNaeNzxJmrvnaOrt0aLbEBQKzwS 1Oc32WCuHajc2t/EN2OX3MQ3rX/a0XdtMoyhBliloCrCzDWXfIsbGucoGDAsxRv7 FK3w7MUbrhBfnZ9fENhaGo5acj2NSfv79Laim5QKCQ/L4Tg6b7BZTFuVFQUgS+hf GS72KI+OQNmemrWB/W4J1ZQlsSO1vwNKJzA2bacMsX1RpOy2qWQ= =UfvN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wXQQzUSsR/l35gkf--