From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/15] Prepare for new Intel Family numbers
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 19:35:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9m9B7BmoItsfjiM@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df1b95d7-c953-4757-b742-3072f65539f7@intel.com>
* Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com> wrote:
> On 2/19/2025 10:41 AM, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> > ---Summary---
> > Mainstream Intel processors have been using Family 6 for a couple of decades.
> > This series is an audit of all the arch/x86 Intel Family-model checks to get
> > ready for the upcoming Family 18 and 19 models. It also converts the last
> > reamaining Intel x86_model checks to VFM ones.
> >
> > Patch 1-8 : Include Dave Hansen's Acked-by.
> > Patch 9-15: Almost ready to merge but don't have review tags yet.
> >
>
> Is there any additional feedback?
Looks mostly good to me.
> Most patches have review tags now or are simple enough that they might
> not need one. Patch 11 can probably use another look.
LGTM, but I've extended the Cc: list to make more people aware.
(I did the same for some of the other patches that could use extra eyes.)
> Patch 14 is the only one that has a minor change. Seeking additional
> input before spinning another revision.
I've applied the first 13 patches to tip:x86/cpu to help move this
along. I fixed a handful of typos, but haven't noticed any functional
problems so far, so unless there's problems in -next this might be OK
for the merge window. (Famous last words.)
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 18:41 [PATCH v3 00/15] Prepare for new Intel Family numbers Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] x86/apic: Fix 32-bit APIC initialization for extended Intel Families Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] x86/cpu/intel: Fix the movsl alignment preference for extended Families Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpu/intel: Fix the MOVSL " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] x86/microcode: Update the Intel processor flag scan check Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] x86/mtrr: Modify a x86_model check to an Intel VFM check Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] x86/cpu/intel: Replace early Family 6 checks with VFM ones Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] x86/cpu/intel: Replace Family 15 " Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] x86/cpu/intel: Replace Family 5 model " Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] x86/acpi/cstate: Improve Intel Family model checks Sohil Mehta
2025-02-20 19:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] x86/smpboot: Remove confusing quirk usage in INIT delay Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] x86/smpboot: Fix INIT delay assignment for extended Intel Families Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] x86/cpu/intel: Fix fast string initialization for extended Families Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] x86/pat: Replace Intel x86_model checks with VFM ones Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/mm/pat: " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] x86/cpu/intel: Bound the non-architectural constant_tsc model checks Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:54 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpu/intel: Limit " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-08-21 13:15 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] x86/cpu/intel: Bound " David Woodhouse
2025-08-21 19:34 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-08-21 19:43 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-08-21 20:09 ` David Woodhouse
2025-08-22 1:46 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-08-24 22:39 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] perf/x86: Simplify Intel PMU initialization Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 20:10 ` Liang, Kan
2025-02-19 20:31 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 20:45 ` Liang, Kan
2025-02-27 0:16 ` [PATCH v3.1 " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] perf/x86/p4: Replace Pentium 4 model checks with VFM ones Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 20:11 ` Liang, Kan
2025-03-17 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] Prepare for new Intel Family numbers Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:35 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2025-03-18 19:10 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 20:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-19 15:53 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 19:46 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9m9B7BmoItsfjiM@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.