All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ublk: remove io_cmds list in ublk_queue
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 10:14:25 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9oogb9i70X0hjsP@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250318-ublk_io_cmds-v1-1-c1bb74798fef@purestorage.com>

On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 12:14:17PM -0600, Uday Shankar wrote:
> The current I/O dispatch mechanism - queueing I/O by adding it to the
> io_cmds list (and poking task_work as needed), then dispatching it in
> ublk server task context by reversing io_cmds and completing the
> io_uring command associated to each one - was introduced by commit
> 7d4a93176e014 ("ublk_drv: don't forward io commands in reserve order")
> to ensure that the ublk server received I/O in the same order that the
> block layer submitted it to ublk_drv. This mechanism was only needed for
> the "raw" task_work submission mechanism, since the io_uring task work
> wrapper maintains FIFO ordering (using quite a similar mechanism in
> fact). The "raw" task_work submission mechanism is no longer supported
> in ublk_drv as of commit 29dc5d06613f2 ("ublk: kill queuing request by
> task_work_add"), so the explicit llist/reversal is no longer needed - it
> just duplicates logic already present in the underlying io_uring APIs.
> Remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uday Shankar <ushankar@purestorage.com>

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>

Thanks,
Ming


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-03-19  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-18 18:14 [PATCH] ublk: remove io_cmds list in ublk_queue Uday Shankar
2025-03-18 18:22 ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-18 18:43   ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-18 18:48     ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-18 21:58       ` Uday Shankar
2025-03-19  1:54         ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-19  1:04       ` Ming Lei
2025-03-19  1:57         ` Jens Axboe
2025-03-19  2:14 ` Ming Lei [this message]
2025-03-19 12:32 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z9oogb9i70X0hjsP@fedora \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ushankar@purestorage.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.