From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 060831E0DE2; Wed, 19 Mar 2025 16:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742401002; cv=none; b=cxXEjmjc9omBwSX2Sl3CRlLXY3x1WvHdYRL/3PWmPCH14UXqU+PabZfICp05zNzDgd0MdZQVvlNjmOBiZ7Hnblh7+MDmKEZolagOa9SKBUNJPlARtpF0GzBO1htv/bj1/UViOuHBLXUr2FSioXcOJ/lVf/NqWKgRR2WbnGyXgiY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742401002; c=relaxed/simple; bh=I48t3G+zI/DqaZbmsbXC24iEmLF1ScercaVRJJZw/+o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rGj8CEaL/Vc1HW4o2EvVDK9s5zkb7ST6yXSDuns7/4RiBChKVftvOXecsv9faFRkke4WTaFrdYi6IRKLF8hu1sDUy9NN1IsCBQ5Drh3CV5XtA5uTnJzYPNrdFFes7e2AfJUN6Cggl1JnNMhTgtzW6Sj6Z5899FfB3rd0dSr8/IA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=zOwMfYiw; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=CYmRdPjv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="zOwMfYiw"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="CYmRdPjv" Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:16:37 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1742400999; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=W5ALVHkpdt7i16xvL9Sq6iWXM43kC76kXA1K3lnVR4k=; b=zOwMfYiw6lG6jNRVOrGkwyZZrmareTnzRKR8hunLu3dpvuijW+OQJ3oGxhtQi+Sxf7hk9G SLA9zl8Kh7bEl3h7HGOmezhbcKXtmkTyXYrXuG9S6t8Ax86KvcX9n6WSn9qPIgiE0RK78l HPMOdUoTt++RpFK9jtlZ2Y5ozZqoqjpzOE2kR0jnUrpDOWybCHqj+JLCZBegcK3gNS9IUI 9ZzG0yo1N0U+hiZAceLGaQ1MA46CwMMHDjcPeCypRELhulQBDjnLKo3pN8wWu19cxYIVIc wZZ9Refm6080Z+LvKdHCo5zmLrGJSdRi4mSQUX2ayE2RLahIQi8H8XeVKAjj3g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1742400999; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=W5ALVHkpdt7i16xvL9Sq6iWXM43kC76kXA1K3lnVR4k=; b=CYmRdPjvK0RG3lBt/kQd3/vl0FIJRQpzNDaWlJo+39tpEh+dDKzS4FpNZmUEgzl1JBMSec z8vtWfL29RjnYWAQ== From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" To: kernel test robot Cc: Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , Borislav Petkov , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Cooper , "H. Peter Anvin" , John Ogness , x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 19/29] x86/cpu: Use enums for TLB descriptor types Message-ID: References: <20250317164745.4754-20-darwi@linutronix.de> <202503192339.PuCOnZaa-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <202503192339.PuCOnZaa-lkp@intel.com> On Thu, 20 Mar 2025, kernel test robot wrote: > > arch/x86/include/asm/cpuid/types.h:56:1: > sparse: static assertion failed: "sizeof(enum _cache_table_type) == 1" > I'll fix it in v4, as detailed in the other email: https://lore.kernel.org/x86-cpuid/Z9rsTirs9lLfEPD9@lx-t490 Thanks, Ahmed