From: Yosry Ahmed <yosry.ahmed@linux.dev>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: Add a module param to control and enumerate device posted IRQs
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2025 18:14:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z9xbBSaephBj-OO1@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z9xXd5CoHh5Eo2TK@google.com>
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 10:59:19AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2025, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > index f76d655dc9a8..e7eb2198db26 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> > @@ -227,6 +227,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(allow_smaller_maxphyaddr);
> > bool __read_mostly enable_apicv = true;
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_apicv);
> >
> > +bool __read_mostly enable_device_posted_irqs = true;
> > +module_param(enable_device_posted_irqs, bool, 0444);
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_device_posted_irqs);
> > +
> > const struct _kvm_stats_desc kvm_vm_stats_desc[] = {
> > KVM_GENERIC_VM_STATS(),
> > STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, mmu_shadow_zapped),
> > @@ -9772,6 +9776,9 @@ int kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops)
> > if (r != 0)
> > goto out_mmu_exit;
> >
> > + enable_device_posted_irqs &= enable_apicv &&
> > + irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP);
>
> Drat, this is flawed. Putting the module param in kvm.ko means that loading
> kvm.ko with enable_device_posted_irqs=true, but a vendor module with APICv/AVIC
> disabled, leaves enable_device_posted_irqs disabled for the lifetime of kvm.ko.
> I.e. reloading the vendor module with APICv/AVIC enabled can't enable device
> posted IRQs.
>
> Option #1 is to do what we do for enable_mmio_caching, and snapshot userspace's
> desire.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index e7eb2198db26..c84ad9109108 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ bool __read_mostly enable_apicv = true;
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_apicv);
>
> bool __read_mostly enable_device_posted_irqs = true;
> +bool __ro_after_init allow_device_posted_irqs;
> module_param(enable_device_posted_irqs, bool, 0444);
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(enable_device_posted_irqs);
>
> @@ -9776,8 +9777,8 @@ int kvm_x86_vendor_init(struct kvm_x86_init_ops *ops)
> if (r != 0)
> goto out_mmu_exit;
>
> - enable_device_posted_irqs &= enable_apicv &&
> - irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP);
> + enable_device_posted_irqs = allow_device_posted_irqs && enable_apicv &&
> + irq_remapping_cap(IRQ_POSTING_CAP);
>
> kvm_ops_update(ops);
>
> @@ -14033,6 +14034,8 @@ EXPORT_TRACEPOINT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_rmp_fault);
>
> static int __init kvm_x86_init(void)
> {
> + allow_device_posted_irqs = enable_device_posted_irqs;
> +
> kvm_init_xstate_sizes();
>
> kvm_mmu_x86_module_init();
>
>
> Option #2 is to shove the module param into vendor code, but leave the variable
> in kvm.ko, like we do for enable_apicv.
>
> I'm leaning toward option #2, as it's more flexible, arguably more intuitive, and
> doesn't prevent putting the logic in kvm_x86_vendor_init().
+1, option #1 seems a bit confusing to me.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-20 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-20 14:20 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: x86: Add a module param for device posted IRQs Sean Christopherson
2025-03-20 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] KVM: VMX: Don't send UNBLOCK when starting device assignment without APICv Sean Christopherson
2025-03-20 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: SVM: Don't update IRTEs if APICv/AVIC is disable Sean Christopherson
2025-03-20 16:08 ` Jim Mattson
2025-03-20 14:20 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: Add a module param to control and enumerate device posted IRQs Sean Christopherson
2025-03-20 16:02 ` Jim Mattson
2025-03-20 17:54 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-20 17:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-20 18:14 ` Yosry Ahmed [this message]
2025-03-21 1:57 ` Chao Gao
2025-03-21 20:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-03-24 9:26 ` Chao Gao
2025-03-24 13:41 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Z9xbBSaephBj-OO1@google.com \
--to=yosry.ahmed@linux.dev \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.