All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Ivan Delalande <colona@arista.com>,
	kadlec@netfilter.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: ctnetlink: revert to dumping mark regardless of event type
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 12:12:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZACEhssZ7KcCnHjw@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230302105115.GB23204@breakpoint.cc>

On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:51:15AM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Ivan Delalande <colona@arista.com> wrote:
> > I assume that change was unintentional, we have userspace code that
> > needs the mark while listening for events like REPLY, DESTROY, etc.
> > 
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Fixes: 1feeae071507 ("netfilter: ctnetlink: fix compilation warning after data race fixes in ct mark")
> > Signed-off-by: Ivan Delalande <colona@arista.com>
> > ---
> >  net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> > index c11dff91d52d..194822f8f1ee 100644
> > --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> > +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_netlink.c
> > @@ -831,7 +831,7 @@ ctnetlink_conntrack_event(unsigned int events, const struct nf_ct_event *item)
> >  	}
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK_MARK
> > -	if (events & (1 << IPCT_MARK) &&
> > +	if ((events & (1 << IPCT_MARK) || READ_ONCE(ct->mark)) &&
> >  	    ctnetlink_dump_mark(skb, ct) < 0)
> >  		goto nla_put_failure;
> 
> Probably better to just drop the event bit test?
> 
> if (ctnetlink_dump_mark(skb, ct) < 0)
> 	goto nla_put_failure;

Looks good to me, but 1feeae071507 also changes behaviour in another
way: if ct->mark is reset to zero (being non-zero before), the event
will not show mark=0 which is probably relevant to userspace. It is a
strange corner case though.

Maybe this?

        if (ctnetlink_dump_mark(skb, ct, events & (1 << IPCT_MARK)))
                goto nla_put_failure;

then:

static int ctnetlink_dump_mark(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nf_conn *ct, bool dump)
{
        u32 mark = READ_ONCE(ct->mark);

        if (!mark && !dump)
                return 0;

then in __ctnetlink_glue_build() and ctnetlink_dump_info():

        ctnetlink_dump_mark(..., true)

It seems 1feeae071507 also changed conntrack -L, before my update,
mark=0 was included in the listing.

Probably a good chance to fix these subtle changes.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-02 11:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-02  2:22 [PATCH] netfilter: ctnetlink: revert to dumping mark regardless of event type Ivan Delalande
2023-03-02 10:51 ` Florian Westphal
2023-03-02 11:12   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2023-03-02 11:27     ` Florian Westphal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZACEhssZ7KcCnHjw@salvia \
    --to=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=colona@arista.com \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=kadlec@netfilter.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.