All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Peter Maydell" <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
	"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Markus Armbruster" <armbru@redhat.com>,
	"Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, "Maxim Levitsky" <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
	libvir-list@redhat.com,
	"Richard Henderson" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	"Reinoud Zandijk" <reinoud@netbsd.org>,
	"Wilfred Mallawa" <wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com>,
	"John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/5] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 14:06:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZAXzUIs6wODe7/hf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a97c8b6d-8e58-82b5-d73f-72a7061fb5d4@redhat.com>

On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 02:48:16PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 06/03/2023 10.27, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 09:46:55AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
> > > [...] If a 32-bit CPU guest
> > > +environment should be enforced, you can switch off the "long mode" CPU
> > > +flag, e.g. with ``-cpu max,lm=off``.
> > 
> > I had the idea to check this today and this is not quite sufficient,
> [...]
> > A further difference is that qemy-system-i686 does not appear to enable
> > the 'syscall' flag, but I've not figured out where that difference is
> > coming from in the code.
> 
> I think I just spotted this by accident in target/i386/cpu.c
> around line 637:
> 
> #ifdef TARGET_X86_64
> #define TCG_EXT2_X86_64_FEATURES (CPUID_EXT2_SYSCALL | CPUID_EXT2_LM)
> #else
> #define TCG_EXT2_X86_64_FEATURES 0
> #endif

Hmm, so right now the difference between qemu-system-i386 and
qemu-system-x86_64 is based on compile time conditionals. So we
have the burden of building everything twice and also a burden
of testing everything twice.

If we eliminate qemu-system-i386 we get rid of our own burden,
but users/mgmt apps need to adapt to force qemu-system-x86_64
to present a 32-bit system.

What about if we had qemu-system-i386 be a hardlink to
qemu-system-x86_64, and then changed behaviour based off the
executed binary name ?

ie if running qemu-system-i386, we could present a 32-bit CPU by
default. We eliminate all of our double compilation burden still.
We still have extra testing burden, but it is in a fairly narrow
area, so does not imply x2 the testing burden just $small-percentage
extra testing ?  That would means apps/users would not need to change
at all, but we still get most of the win we're after on the
QEMU side 

Essentially #ifdef TARGET_X86_64  would be change  'if (is_64bit) {...}'
in a handful of places, with 'bool is_64bit' initialized in main() from
argv[0] ?

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-06 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-06  8:46 [PATCH v4 0/5] Deprecate system emulation support for 32-bit x86 and arm hosts Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  8:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit x86 hosts for system emulation Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  8:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate the qemu-system-i386 binary Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  9:27   ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06  9:54     ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  9:58       ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06 13:48     ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-06 14:06       ` Daniel P. Berrangé [this message]
2023-03-06 14:18         ` Thomas Huth
2023-03-06 14:25           ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06 14:58             ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2023-03-06 14:56         ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-06  8:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the i386 system emulation job Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  9:19   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-06  8:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] docs/about/deprecated: Deprecate 32-bit arm hosts for system emulation Thomas Huth
2023-03-06  9:23   ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2023-03-07  2:43   ` Richard Henderson
2023-03-06  8:46 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] gitlab-ci.d/crossbuilds: Drop the 32-bit arm system emulation jobs Thomas Huth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZAXzUIs6wODe7/hf@redhat.com \
    --to=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de \
    --cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=reinoud@netbsd.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=wilfred.mallawa@wdc.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.