From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D4857B for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 07:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95641C433EF; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 07:57:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1678521437; bh=Gg16DCykJnE2Bhw2ejexmfCb52yIzdYHCxDa3JlpAbE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gzGhctNUhn4NXUQyyAwllTMN+IEjkkXebZzYti5laFRdavjcYflS/A7tZnaiI8yU1 I885XBkAlyECh1czT2rDSTVhF8HLOXbrFeBeeHVPUAXHkJzEwFiZtJYWLKSpJSR1Ac JOptKAO5qt/aguAxHHQ21+PinmZFwIvJ5kjKvkd8= Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 08:57:14 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Luis Chamberlain Cc: pvorel@suse.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, Jason@zx2c4.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, yzaikin@google.com, j.granados@samsung.com, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] utsname: simplify one-level sysctl registration for uts_kern_table Message-ID: References: <20230310231656.3955051-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230310231656.3955051-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 03:16:56PM -0800, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > There is no need to declare an extra tables to just create directory, > this can be easily be done with a prefix path with register_sysctl(). > > Simplify this registration. > > Signed-off-by: Luis Chamberlain Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman > --- > > This is part of the effort to phase out calls that can recurse from > sysctl registration [0]. If you have a tree to take this in feel free > to take it, or I can take it too through sysclt-next. Let me know! > > This file has no explicit maintainer, so I assume there is no tree. > > If I so no one taking it I can take in as part of sysctl-next later. I recommend taking it in your tree like this, thanks. greg k-h