From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f44.google.com (mail-wm1-f44.google.com [209.85.128.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 699A27B for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 12:24:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f44.google.com with SMTP id bg16-20020a05600c3c9000b003eb34e21bdfso7912480wmb.0 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 04:24:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678537477; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=ktDtq6F5mYK2om1OkmlupbObQARt7GGBfAckHwwPD5s=; b=SJmbpgMg1wWeZlpCieTj0YgVoj6N0l3ju7FpvmBybLKjaMMXTS+HFZDJIcGooFODJs WaE+YlV3Xd+3AucPMZ31HT6n2ImvFxaChorJEhb4ZfNE3Zw7Bx/MpwHXbSEW3c1IzECp qCZkW4tbof5nXEqko3jKaa1nhkY+k1RLgce5njC05FE9K5d4rcpQlyHHVHqic7JOdKEL O8zhLGO2zv7O618oBuDwtQPjZ07OU+ffmmAAwAI+T9yyEyPBVj11HG+U0c+SofnPCsdN E+V5E+++mhzjcZJSJE4JAcAyEhT1+UFsgLMB+b995XWkHzIWCgjFaxAY7HgpjUdE9WMj qBdw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678537477; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=ktDtq6F5mYK2om1OkmlupbObQARt7GGBfAckHwwPD5s=; b=KiRJSSq/3Xjl+qa9PbPTBWKcf+i6VUGJotOtWmJwMqCnA1KTE07Krthw1LT952exdQ uFxj93FCE3c0vaFBP7yMgoCCUvxzPAPfMgwdZ0+qQ+Qwjv+KuRLGOehGOKC2GM7c+A3A KxmfpVyb60s2a3RQXRbWrzblohDkygjPZ1a84CXjRkeX6n6ecbqrNPEYeD4+YQOXpzN7 yksWj6HI9eXoUTdw2Dp9qYQU/bkle21el0FUOMV81hmpQ/kL/gQsGgMu8STyLCM+h1Pe R3KGUBikt12PbGHl2ZowB91TAWNfTbtXYtVSy1yFzsjncBppx/MFR1V4rWU4hQqERtmY zyHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKVa+c9kNnmY6AQYDreXLgaEGMC0JWy1JvTE6jcXuRpU8uJF5FU9 OvCcxYyjHJbvj5yBu6Ym62Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set96yaiaJ5hySs218YQKWsYE12lJazGBg2QQx4xHtBYi2y4qn1VzdHW+JeV8PI88QTgVwJLjHA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:19cf:b0:3eb:3cc9:9f85 with SMTP id u15-20020a05600c19cf00b003eb3cc99f85mr5798593wmq.26.1678537477544; Sat, 11 Mar 2023 04:24:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian ([63.135.72.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z17-20020a5d44d1000000b002c5691f13eesm2339151wrr.50.2023.03.11.04.24.37 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 11 Mar 2023 04:24:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2023 12:24:35 +0000 From: Sudip Mukherjee To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de, jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/357] 5.4.235-rc1 review Message-ID: References: <20230310133733.973883071@linuxfoundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230310133733.973883071@linuxfoundation.org> Hi Greg, On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:34:49PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.235 release. > There are 357 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Sun, 12 Mar 2023 13:36:38 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230210): mips: 65 configs -> 1 failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> failed xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Note: mips build failed with the error: arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:42:44: error: expected ')' before '&' token 42 | static DECLARE_TASKLET(pvc_display_tasklet, &pvc_display, 0); | ^~ | ) arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c: In function 'pvc_line_proc_write': arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:27: error: 'pvc_display_tasklet' undeclared (first use in this function) 87 | tasklet_schedule(&pvc_display_tasklet); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:87:27: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in At top level: arch/mips/lasat/picvue_proc.c:33:13: error: 'pvc_display' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] 33 | static void pvc_display(unsigned long data) | ^~~~~~~~~~~ s390 build failed with: drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag.c:658:23: error: initialization of 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, __u8)' {aka 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, unsigned char)'} from incompatible pointer type 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, __u8, __u8)' {aka 'int (*)(struct dasd_device *, unsigned char, unsigned char)'} [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 658 | .pe_handler = dasd_diag_pe_handler, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ drivers/s390/block/dasd_diag.c:658:23: note: (near initialization for 'dasd_diag_discipline.pe_handler') Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/3081 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee -- Regards Sudip