From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] blk-mq: release crypto keyslot before reporting I/O complete
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2023 11:20:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBC63ry7EFMr+Xzk@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJkfWY76-fUf92YZid3bOPrufXwCzM-q9L1ezqkLZ+WJiWL3jQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 02:26:00PM -0700, Nathan Huckleberry wrote:
> > diff --git a/block/blk-merge.c b/block/blk-merge.c
> > index 6460abdb2426..65e75efa9bd3 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-merge.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-merge.c
> > @@ -867,6 +867,8 @@ static struct request *attempt_merge(struct request_queue *q,
> > if (!blk_discard_mergable(req))
> > elv_merge_requests(q, req, next);
> >
> > + blk_crypto_rq_put_keyslot(next);
> > +
>
> This looks good to me, but it looks like there was a pre-existing bug
> in the blk-merge code. The elv_merged_request function is only called
> when the request does not merge. Does anyone know if that behavior is
> correct?
That's very confusing to me too!
I did notice that attempt_merge() calls elv_merge_requests() (not to be confused
with elv_merged_request()) if it merges the requests.
So it seems there is elv_merge_requests() which means the request was merged,
and elv_merged_request() which means the request was *not* merged... I have no
idea what is going on there :-(
> This patch itself looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Huckleberry <nhuck@google.com>
Thanks.
Jens, Christoph, etc., anyone else want to take a look too?
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-14 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-08 19:36 [PATCH v2 0/4] Fix blk-crypto keyslot race condition Eric Biggers
2023-03-08 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] blk-mq: release crypto keyslot before reporting I/O complete Eric Biggers
2023-03-13 21:26 ` Nathan Huckleberry
2023-03-14 18:20 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2023-03-15 16:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-15 16:19 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-08 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] blk-crypto: make blk_crypto_evict_key() more robust Eric Biggers
2023-03-15 16:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-15 18:26 ` Eric Biggers
2023-03-08 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] blk-crypto: remove blk_crypto_insert_cloned_request() Eric Biggers
2023-03-15 16:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-15 18:27 ` Eric Biggers
2023-03-08 19:36 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] blk-crypto: drop the NULL check from blk_crypto_put_keyslot() Eric Biggers
2023-03-15 16:24 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZBC63ry7EFMr+Xzk@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhuck@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.