From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06b.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 684C937A for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:47:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1678927636; x=1710463636; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=k6y8x3QVhVMEFGgBzZkQgq8VEz6KEnSUj9UHzHObRUM=; b=Hg/fwBtLPlXr+gRPxLExQdbUBbZNoOgOMFI1joUNIeT2hyKmgK1CFFQJ E0yO/rv+uNZP3ltFOfEV0ndY3cCEkT3TVqQPz8WgVDFDOSLWWbbpb5/ql Rmkd1MYEloEoscdpqq/gtA6sJUU00y+kDkO5e6bN07S9CpjyLFl3uZWdV QlJgC5kIGAFHg5645vJqUWx3hNQ8BGZDSRsUtWjTqzfjTnmANMmXGDafs JK4V29rzG4Y3b0X1H1IAbp70IbvJuksXThaKgPwG62lYbMQIkUZSSKmvU WnLiLl1pKowv9XjSXNj7kA1CB3siRIyD981dCpVEbTs9u9XC3Ey17+t3r g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10650"; a="400431449" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,262,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="400431449" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Mar 2023 17:47:15 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10650"; a="1009026085" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.98,262,1673942400"; d="scan'208";a="1009026085" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b613635ddfff) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2023 17:47:14 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b613635ddfff with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1pcblx-0008AB-2Y; Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:47:13 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 08:46:53 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Al Viro Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com Subject: [lkp] [+118 bytes kernel size regression] [i386-tinyconfig] [6e6937ac88] fs: introduce lock_rename_child() helper Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230315223435.5139-3-linkinjeon@kernel.org> FYI, we noticed a +118 bytes kernel size regression due to commit: commit: 6e6937ac882828b632bbcecf35ce35d280a2b4fb (fs: introduce lock_rename_child() helper) url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Namjae-Jeon/ksmbd-remove-internal-h-include/20230316-063731 base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/vfs/idmapping.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230315223435.5139-3-linkinjeon@kernel.org/ patch subject: [PATCH v8 2/3] fs: introduce lock_rename_child() helper Details as below (size data is obtained by `nm --size-sort vmlinux`): 2d2e9d60: ksmbd: remove internal.h include 6e6937ac: fs: introduce lock_rename_child() helper +---------------------------+----------+----------+-------+ | symbol | 2d2e9d60 | 6e6937ac | delta | +---------------------------+----------+----------+-------+ | nm.T.lock_rename_child | 0 | 98 | 98 | | nm.t.lock_two_directories | 0 | 77 | 77 | | bzImage | 501536 | 501600 | 64 | | nm.T.lock_rename | 109 | 52 | -57 | +---------------------------+----------+----------+-------+ Thanks