All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: rcu@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, seanjc@google.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 3/7] locking: Reduce the number of locks in ww_mutex stress tests
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:26:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBTa/pQ1cm9V4Pvn@boqun-archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e8a6800-78e7-42bf-b4ff-5d7ef43511c5@paulmck-laptop>

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 11:38:19AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 08:13:35PM -0700, Boqun Feng wrote:
> > The stress test in test_ww_mutex_init() uses 4095 locks since
> > lockdep::reference has 12 bits, and since we are going to reduce it to
> > 11 bits to support lock_sync(), and 2047 is still a reasonable number of
> > the max nesting level for locks, so adjust the test.
> > 
> > Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202302011445.9d99dae2-oliver.sang@intel.com
> > Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
> 
> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> 

Applied, thanks!

Regards,
Boqun

> > ---
> >  kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
> > index 29dc253d03af..93cca6e69860 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/test-ww_mutex.c
> > @@ -659,7 +659,7 @@ static int __init test_ww_mutex_init(void)
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -	ret = stress(4095, hweight32(STRESS_ALL)*ncpus, STRESS_ALL);
> > +	ret = stress(2047, hweight32(STRESS_ALL)*ncpus, STRESS_ALL);
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.39.2
> > 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-17 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-17  3:13 [PATCH rcu 0/7] RCU-related lockdep changes for v6.4 Boqun Feng
2023-03-17  3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 1/7] locking/lockdep: Introduce lock_sync() Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 17:06   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-03-20 17:50     ` Boqun Feng
2023-03-17  3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 2/7] rcu: Annotate SRCU's update-side lockdep dependencies Boqun Feng
2023-03-17  3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 3/7] locking: Reduce the number of locks in ww_mutex stress tests Boqun Feng
2023-03-17 18:38   ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-17 21:26     ` Boqun Feng [this message]
2023-03-17  3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 4/7] locking/lockdep: Improve the deadlock scenario print for sync and read lock Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 12:13   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-03-20 17:50     ` Boqun Feng
2023-03-17  3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 5/7] rcutorture: Add SRCU deadlock scenarios Boqun Feng
2023-03-17  3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 6/7] rcutorture: Add RCU Tasks Trace and " Boqun Feng
2023-03-17  3:13 ` [PATCH rcu 7/7] rcutorture: Add srcu_lockdep.sh Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 18:19   ` Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 19:09     ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-20 19:28       ` Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 20:22         ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-03-20 20:26           ` Boqun Feng
2023-03-20 20:36             ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBTa/pQ1cm9V4Pvn@boqun-archlinux \
    --to=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.