All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Cc: "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>,
	"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
	"Hildebrand, Stewart" <Stewart.Hildebrand@amd.com>,
	"Xenia Ragiadakou" <burzalodowa@gmail.com>,
	"Huang, Honglei1" <Honglei1.Huang@amd.com>,
	"Zhang, Julia" <Julia.Zhang@amd.com>,
	"Chen, Jiqian" <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>,
	"Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	"Anthony PERARD" <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC XEN PATCH 2/6] vpci: accept BAR writes if dom0 is PVH
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:36:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBl6iU6T1CsWqVx9@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8adfeb57-1ddd-255d-6d93-24a74b463f59@suse.com>

Hi Jan,

On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 12:02:35AM +0800, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.03.2023 08:54, Huang Rui wrote:
> > From: Chen Jiqian <Jiqian.Chen@amd.com>
> > 
> > When dom0 is PVH and we want to passthrough gpu to guest,
> > we should allow BAR writes even through BAR is mapped. If
> > not, the value of BARs are not initialized when guest firstly
> > start.
> 
> From this it doesn't become clear why a GPU would be special in this
> regard, or what (if any) prior bug there was. Are you suggesting ...
> 

You're right. This is in fact a buggy we encountered while we start the
guest domU.

> > --- a/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> > +++ b/xen/drivers/vpci/header.c
> > @@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static void cf_check bar_write(
> >       * Xen only cares whether the BAR is mapped into the p2m, so allow BAR
> >       * writes as long as the BAR is not mapped into the p2m.
> >       */
> > -    if ( bar->enabled )
> > +    if ( pci_conf_read16(pdev->sbdf, PCI_COMMAND) & PCI_COMMAND_MEMORY )
> >      {
> >          /* If the value written is the current one avoid printing a warning. */
> >          if ( val != (uint32_t)(bar->addr >> (hi ? 32 : 0)) )
> 
> ... bar->enabled doesn't properly reflect the necessary state? It
> generally shouldn't be necessary to look at the physical device's
> state here.
> 
> Furthermore when you make a change in a case like this, the
> accompanying comment also needs updating (which might have clarified
> what, if anything, has been wrong).
> 

That is the problem that we start domU at the first time, the enable flag
will be set while the passthrough device would like to write the real pcie
bar on the host. And yes, it's temporary workaround, we should figure out
the root cause.

Thanks,
Ray


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-12  7:54 [RFC XEN PATCH 0/6] Introduce VirtIO GPU and Passthrough GPU support on Xen PVH dom0 Huang Rui
2023-03-12  7:54 ` [RFC XEN PATCH 1/6] x86/pvh: report ACPI VFCT table to dom0 if present Huang Rui
2023-03-13 11:55   ` Andrew Cooper
2023-03-13 12:21     ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-13 12:27       ` Andrew Cooper
2023-03-21  6:26         ` Huang Rui
2023-03-12  7:54 ` [RFC XEN PATCH 2/6] vpci: accept BAR writes if dom0 is PVH Huang Rui
2023-03-13  7:23   ` Christian König
2023-03-13  7:26     ` Christian König
2023-03-13  8:46       ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-13  8:55       ` Huang Rui
2023-03-14 23:42       ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-03-14 16:02   ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-21  9:36     ` Huang Rui [this message]
2023-03-21  9:41       ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-21 10:14         ` Huang Rui
2023-03-21 10:20           ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-21 11:49             ` Huang Rui
2023-03-21 12:20               ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-21 12:25                 ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-21 12:59                 ` Huang Rui
2023-03-21 12:27               ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-21 13:03                 ` Huang Rui
2023-03-22  7:28                   ` Huang Rui
2023-03-22  7:45                     ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-22  9:34                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-22 12:33                       ` Huang Rui
2023-03-22 12:48                         ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-23 10:26                           ` Huang Rui
2023-03-23 14:16                             ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-23 10:43                           ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-23 13:34                             ` Huang Rui
2023-03-23 16:23                               ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-24  4:37                                 ` Huang Rui
2023-03-12  7:54 ` [RFC XEN PATCH 3/6] x86/pvh: shouldn't check pirq flag when map pirq in PVH Huang Rui
2023-03-14 16:27   ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-15 15:57   ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-16  0:22     ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-03-21 10:09     ` Huang Rui
2023-03-21 10:17       ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-12  7:54 ` [RFC XEN PATCH 4/6] x86/pvh: PVH dom0 also need PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi call Huang Rui
2023-03-14 16:30   ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-15 17:01     ` Andrew Cooper
2023-03-16  0:26       ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-03-16  0:39         ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-03-16  8:51         ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-16  9:18           ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-16  7:05       ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-21 12:42       ` Huang Rui
2023-03-21 12:22     ` Huang Rui
2023-03-12  7:54 ` [RFC XEN PATCH 5/6] tools/libs/call: add linux os call to get gsi from irq Huang Rui
2023-03-14 16:36   ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-12  7:54 ` [RFC XEN PATCH 6/6] tools/libs/light: pci: translate irq to gsi Huang Rui
2023-03-14 16:39   ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-15 16:35   ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-16  0:44     ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-03-16  8:54       ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-16  8:55       ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-16  9:27         ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-16  9:42           ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-16 23:19             ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-03-17  8:39               ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-17  9:51                 ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-17 18:15                   ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-03-17 19:48                     ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-17 20:55                       ` Stefano Stabellini
2023-03-20 15:16                         ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-03-20 15:29                           ` Jan Beulich
2023-03-20 16:50                             ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-07-31 16:40                         ` Chen, Jiqian
2023-08-23  8:57                           ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-08-31  8:56                             ` Chen, Jiqian
2023-03-13  7:24 ` [RFC XEN PATCH 0/6] Introduce VirtIO GPU and Passthrough GPU support on Xen PVH dom0 Christian König
2023-03-21 10:26   ` Huang Rui
2023-03-20 16:22 ` Huang Rui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBl6iU6T1CsWqVx9@amd.com \
    --to=ray.huang@amd.com \
    --cc=Alexander.Deucher@amd.com \
    --cc=Christian.Koenig@amd.com \
    --cc=Honglei1.Huang@amd.com \
    --cc=Jiqian.Chen@amd.com \
    --cc=Julia.Zhang@amd.com \
    --cc=Stewart.Hildebrand@amd.com \
    --cc=anthony.perard@citrix.com \
    --cc=burzalodowa@gmail.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.