All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: "Jouni Högander" <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Fix Wa_16013835468 and Wa_14015648006
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:34:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBnOluYrXFmh3pKT@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230320165945.3564891-3-jouni.hogander@intel.com>

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 06:59:43PM +0200, Jouni Högander wrote:
> PSR WM optimization should be disabled based on any wm level being
> disabled. Currently it's disabled always when using delayed vblank.
> Also same WA should be applied for ICL as well
> 
> Bspec: 71580
> 
> v2:
>  - set/clear chicken bit in post_plane_update
>  - apply for ICL as well
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h    |  1 +
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c      | 67 ++++++++++++-------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c  |  7 +-
>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> index c32bfba06ca1..60504c390408 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_types.h
> @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ struct intel_crtc_state {
>  	bool has_psr2;
>  	bool enable_psr2_sel_fetch;
>  	bool req_psr2_sdp_prior_scanline;
> +	bool wm_level_disabled;
>  	u32 dc3co_exitline;
>  	u16 su_y_granularity;
>  	struct drm_dp_vsc_sdp psr_vsc;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> index 8dbf452d63c2..1050d777a108 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_psr.c
> @@ -1173,18 +1173,6 @@ static void intel_psr_enable_source(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
>  			     intel_dp->psr.psr2_sel_fetch_enabled ?
>  			     IGNORE_PSR2_HW_TRACKING : 0);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * Wa_16013835468
> -	 * Wa_14015648006
> -	 */
> -	if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> -	    IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 12, 13)) {
> -		if (crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vblank_start !=
> -		    crtc_state->hw.adjusted_mode.crtc_vdisplay)
> -			intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, 0,
> -				     wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp));
> -	}
> -
>  	if (intel_dp->psr.psr2_enabled) {
>  		if (DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv) == 9)
>  			intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, CHICKEN_TRANS(cpu_transcoder), 0,
> @@ -1362,7 +1350,7 @@ static void intel_psr_disable_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
>  	 * Wa_14015648006
>  	 */
>  	if (IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) ||
> -	    IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 12, 13))
> +	    IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 11, 13))
>  		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
>  			     wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
>  
> @@ -1941,33 +1929,64 @@ void intel_psr_pre_plane_update(struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Wa_16013835468
> + * Wa_14015648006
> + */
> +static void wa_16013835468(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, bool wm_level_disabled)
> +{
> +	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dp_to_i915(intel_dp);
> +
> +	if (!IS_MTL_DISPLAY_STEP(dev_priv, STEP_A0, STEP_B0) &&
> +	    !IS_DISPLAY_VER(dev_priv, 11, 13))
> +		return;

This is still confusing the two different workarounds,
and actually losing the one about the delayed vblank.

> +
> +	if (intel_dp->psr.enabled && wm_level_disabled)
> +		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1, 0,
> +			     wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp));
> +	else
> +		intel_de_rmw(dev_priv, GEN8_CHICKEN_DCPR_1,
> +			     wa_16013835468_bit_get(intel_dp), 0);
> +}
> +
>  static void _intel_psr_post_plane_update(const struct intel_atomic_state *state,
> -					 const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +					 const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> +					 const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)

The rename reduces the signal-to-noise ratio near zero.

>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
>  	struct intel_encoder *encoder;
>  
> -	if (!crtc_state->has_psr)
> +	if (!new_crtc_state->has_psr)
>  		return;
>  
>  	for_each_intel_encoder_mask_with_psr(state->base.dev, encoder,
> -					     crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
> +					     new_crtc_state->uapi.encoder_mask) {
>  		struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
>  		struct intel_psr *psr = &intel_dp->psr;
>  		bool keep_disabled = false;
>  
>  		mutex_lock(&psr->lock);
>  
> -		drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, psr->enabled && !crtc_state->active_planes);
> +		drm_WARN_ON(&dev_priv->drm, psr->enabled &&
> +			    !new_crtc_state->active_planes);
>  
>  		keep_disabled |= psr->sink_not_reliable;
> -		keep_disabled |= !crtc_state->active_planes;
> +		keep_disabled |= !new_crtc_state->active_planes;
>  
>  		if (!psr->enabled && !keep_disabled)
> -			intel_psr_enable_locked(intel_dp, crtc_state);
> +			intel_psr_enable_locked(intel_dp, new_crtc_state);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Wa_16013835468
> +		 * Wa_14015648006
> +		 */
> +		if (old_crtc_state->wm_level_disabled !=
> +		    new_crtc_state->wm_level_disabled)
> +			wa_16013835468(intel_dp,
> +				       new_crtc_state->wm_level_disabled);
>  
>  		/* Force a PSR exit when enabling CRC to avoid CRC timeouts */
> -		if (crtc_state->crc_enabled && psr->enabled)
> +		if (new_crtc_state->crc_enabled && psr->enabled)
>  			psr_force_hw_tracking_exit(intel_dp);
>  
>  		mutex_unlock(&psr->lock);
> @@ -1977,15 +1996,17 @@ static void _intel_psr_post_plane_update(const struct intel_atomic_state *state,
>  void intel_psr_post_plane_update(const struct intel_atomic_state *state)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> -	struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> +	struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state, *old_crtc_state;
>  	struct intel_crtc *crtc;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	if (!HAS_PSR(dev_priv))
>  		return;
>  
> -	for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i)
> -		_intel_psr_post_plane_update(state, crtc_state);
> +	for_each_oldnew_intel_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state,
> +					    new_crtc_state, i)
> +		_intel_psr_post_plane_update(state, old_crtc_state,
> +					     new_crtc_state);
>  }
>  
>  static int _psr2_ready_for_pipe_update_locked(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> index 50a9a6adbe32..afb751c024ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_watermark.c
> @@ -2273,9 +2273,12 @@ static int skl_wm_check_vblank(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
>  		return level;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * FIXME PSR needs to toggle LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
> +	 * PSR needs to toggle LATENCY_REPORTING_REMOVED_PIPE_*
>  	 * based on whether we're limited by the vblank duration.
> -	 *
> +	 */
> +	crtc_state->wm_level_disabled = level < i915->display.wm.num_levels - 1;
> +
> +	/*
>  	 * FIXME also related to skl+ w/a 1136 (also unimplemented as of
>  	 * now) perhaps?
>  	 */
> -- 
> 2.34.1

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-20 16:59 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 0/4] High refresh rate PSR fixes Jouni Högander
2023-03-20 16:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/4] drm/i915/psr: Unify pre/post hooks Jouni Högander
2023-03-20 16:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Fix Wa_16013835468 and Wa_14015648006 Jouni Högander
2023-03-21 15:34   ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2023-03-21 15:57     ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-03-21 16:19       ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-20 16:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 3/4] drm/i915/psr: Check that vblank is long enough for psr2 Jouni Högander
2023-03-21 15:43   ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-21 16:14     ` Hogander, Jouni
2023-03-21 16:29       ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-21 16:41       ` Ville Syrjälä
2023-03-20 16:59 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/4] drm/i915/psr: Implement Display WA #1136 Jouni Högander
2023-03-21  5:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for High refresh rate PSR fixes (rev3) Patchwork
2023-03-21  5:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2023-03-21  5:24 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.DOCS: " Patchwork
2023-03-21  5:36 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2023-03-21  9:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBnOluYrXFmh3pKT@intel.com \
    --to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jouni.hogander@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.