From: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
To: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>,
Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Cc: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Zhong, Yang" <yang.zhong@intel.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2] target/i386: Switch back XFRM value
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 01:32:26 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZC5ZasjwCbnoA04A@yangzhon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3df48e2b-f417-21dc-d386-95399c3e694e@intel.com>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 04:03:54PM +0800, Yang, Weijiang wrote:
>
> On 3/27/2023 3:33 PM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 2:36 AM Yang, Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 10/26/2022 7:57 PM, Zhong, Yang wrote:
> > > > The previous patch wrongly replaced FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_{LO|HI} with
> > > > FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_{LO|HI} in CPUID(EAX=12,ECX=1):{ECX,EDX}, which made
> > > > SGX enclave only supported SSE and x87 feature(xfrm=0x3).
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: 301e90675c3f ("target/i386: Enable support for XSAVES based features")
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yang Zhong <yang.zhong@linux.intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > target/i386/cpu.c | 4 ++--
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > > index ad623d91e4..19aaed877b 100644
> > > > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > > @@ -5584,8 +5584,8 @@ void cpu_x86_cpuid(CPUX86State *env, uint32_t index, uint32_t count,
> > > > } else {
> > > > *eax &= env->features[FEAT_SGX_12_1_EAX];
> > > > *ebx &= 0; /* ebx reserve */
> > > > - *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_LO];
> > > > - *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XSS_HI];
> > > > + *ecx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_LO];
> > > > + *edx &= env->features[FEAT_XSAVE_XCR0_HI];
> > > Oops, that's my fault to replace with wrong definitions, thanks for the fix!
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
> > Hi,
> > I do not have any background on this but stumbled over this and wondered,
> > is there any particular reason why this wasn't applied yet?
> >
> > It seemed to fix a former mistake, was acked and then ... silence
>
> Chris, thanks for the catch!
>
> I double checked this patch isn't in the latest 8.0.0-rc1 tree.
>
>
> Hi, Paolo,
>
> Could you help merge this fixup patch? Thanks!
Hello all,
Let me rebase this patch and resend it, thanks!
Yang
>
> >
> > > > /* FP and SSE are always allowed regardless of XSAVE/XCR0. */
> > > > *ecx |= XSTATE_FP_MASK | XSTATE_SSE_MASK;
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-26 11:57 [RESEND PATCH v2] target/i386: Switch back XFRM value Yang Zhong
2022-10-27 0:28 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-03-27 7:33 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2023-03-27 8:03 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-04-06 5:32 ` Yang Zhong [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZC5ZasjwCbnoA04A@yangzhon \
--to=yang.zhong@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
--cc=yang.zhong@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.