From: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@gmail.com>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:131:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test1'
Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2023 12:42:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZC6h/b2N/u/d4XbT@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202304060622.P2hBPE4g-lkp@intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 07:03:39AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
>
> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> head: 99ddf2254febae9eab7fb0bcc02c5322243f5c49
> commit: fee356ede980b6c2c8db612e18b25738356d6744 selftests/bpf: Add bpf_testmod_fentry_* functions
> date: 5 months ago
> compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-8) 11.3.0
> reproduce:
> # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=fee356ede980b6c2c8db612e18b25738356d6744
> git remote add linus https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
> git fetch --no-tags linus master
> git checkout fee356ede980b6c2c8db612e18b25738356d6744
> make O=/tmp/kselftest headers
> make O=/tmp/kselftest -C tools/testing/selftests
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> | Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202304060622.P2hBPE4g-lkp@intel.com/
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
sry I can't reproduce
it looks like bpf_testmod is not compiled by default with -Wmissing-prototypes,
when I add it I can see those warnings, but it does not seem to be enabled by
default
jirka
>
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:32:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 32 | bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_1(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 a, int b, int c) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:38:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_2' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 38 | bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_2(int a, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 b, int c) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:44:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_3' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 44 | bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_3(int a, int b, struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_2 c) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:50:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_4' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 50 | bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_4(struct bpf_testmod_struct_arg_1 a, int b,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:57:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_5' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 57 | bpf_testmod_test_struct_arg_5(void) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:63:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 63 | bpf_testmod_test_mod_kfunc(int i)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:81:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 81 | bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1(struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 __user *arg) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:89:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_2' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 89 | bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_2(struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_2 *arg) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:94:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_percpu_1' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 94 | bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_percpu_1(struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 __percpu *arg) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:99:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_percpu_2' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 99 | bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_percpu_2(struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_3 *arg) {
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:103:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_loop_test' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 103 | noinline int bpf_testmod_loop_test(int n)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:115:30: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_return_ptr' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 115 | __weak noinline struct file *bpf_testmod_return_ptr(int arg)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:131:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test1' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 131 | noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test1(int a)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:136:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test2' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 136 | noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test2(int a, u64 b)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:141:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test3' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 141 | noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:149:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_read' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 149 | bpf_testmod_test_read(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:200:1: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_test_write' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
> 200 | bpf_testmod_test_write(struct file *file, struct kobject *kobj,
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
> vim +/bpf_testmod_fentry_test1 +131 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c
>
> 130
> > 131 noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test1(int a)
> 132 {
> 133 return a + 1;
> 134 }
> 135
> > 136 noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test2(int a, u64 b)
> 137 {
> 138 return a + b;
> 139 }
> 140
> > 141 noinline int bpf_testmod_fentry_test3(char a, int b, u64 c)
> 142 {
> 143 return a + b + c;
> 144 }
> 145
>
> --
> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-06 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-05 23:03 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_testmod/bpf_testmod.c:131:14: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_testmod_fentry_test1' kernel test robot
2023-04-06 10:42 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZC6h/b2N/u/d4XbT@krava \
--to=olsajiri@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.