From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: hreitz@redhat.com, eesposit@redhat.com, ldoktor@redhat.com,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-8.0] block/export: Fix graph locking in blk_get_geometry() call
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 15:18:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCGXqY5B1GGqvabS@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230327113959.60071-1-kwolf@redhat.com>
Am 27.03.2023 um 13:39 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
> blk_get_geometry() eventually calls bdrv_nb_sectors(), which is a
> co_wrapper_mixed_bdrv_rdlock. This means that when it is called from
> coroutine context, it already assume to have the graph locked.
>
> However, virtio_blk_sect_range_ok() in block/export/virtio-blk-handler.c
> (used by vhost-user-blk and VDUSE exports) runs in a coroutine, but
> doesn't take the graph lock - blk_*() functions are generally expected
> to do that internally. This causes an assertion failure when accessing
> an export for the first time if it runs in an iothread.
>
> This is an example of the crash:
>
> $ ./storage-daemon/qemu-storage-daemon --object iothread,id=th0 --blockdev file,filename=/home/kwolf/images/hd.img,node-name=disk --export vhost-user-blk,addr.type=unix,addr.path=/tmp/vhost.sock,node-name=disk,id=exp0,iothread=th0
> qemu-storage-daemon: ../block/graph-lock.c:268: void assert_bdrv_graph_readable(void): Assertion `qemu_in_main_thread() || reader_count()' failed.
>
> (gdb) bt
Oops, git helpfully removed the "comments"...
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00007ffff6eafe5c in __pthread_kill_implementation () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00007ffff6e5fa76 in raise () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#2 0x00007ffff6e497fc in abort () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#3 0x00007ffff6e4971b in __assert_fail_base.cold () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4 0x00007ffff6e58656 in __assert_fail () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#5 0x00005555556337a3 in assert_bdrv_graph_readable () at ../block/graph-lock.c:268
#6 0x00005555555fd5a2 in bdrv_co_nb_sectors (bs=0x5555564c5ef0) at ../block.c:5847
#7 0x00005555555ee949 in bdrv_nb_sectors (bs=0x5555564c5ef0) at block/block-gen.c:256
#8 0x00005555555fd6b9 in bdrv_get_geometry (bs=0x5555564c5ef0, nb_sectors_ptr=0x7fffef7fedd0) at ../block.c:5884
#9 0x000055555562ad6d in blk_get_geometry (blk=0x5555564cb200, nb_sectors_ptr=0x7fffef7fedd0) at ../block/block-backend.c:1624
#10 0x00005555555ddb74 in virtio_blk_sect_range_ok (blk=0x5555564cb200, block_size=512, sector=0, size=512) at ../block/export/virtio-blk-handler.c:44
#11 0x00005555555dd80d in virtio_blk_process_req (handler=0x5555564cbb98, in_iov=0x7fffe8003830, out_iov=0x7fffe8003860, in_num=1, out_num=0) at ../block/export/virtio-blk-handler.c:189
#12 0x00005555555dd546 in vu_blk_virtio_process_req (opaque=0x7fffe8003800) at ../block/export/vhost-user-blk-server.c:66
#13 0x00005555557bf4a1 in coroutine_trampoline (i0=-402635264, i1=32767) at ../util/coroutine-ucontext.c:177
#14 0x00007ffff6e75c20 in ?? () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#15 0x00007fffefffa870 in ?? ()
#16 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
I'm adding this back while applying (but with indentation this time so
that git doesn't interpret it as comments).
Kevin
> Fix this by creating a new blk_co_get_geometry() that takes the lock,
> and changing blk_get_geometry() to be a co_wrapper_mixed around it.
>
> To make the resulting code cleaner, virtio-blk-handler.c can directly
> call the coroutine version now (though that wouldn't be necessary for
> fixing the bug, taking the lock in blk_co_get_geometry() is what fixes
> it).
>
> Fixes: 8ab8140a04cf771d63e9754d6ba6c1e676bfe507
> Reported-by: Lukáš Doktor <ldoktor@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-27 13:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-27 11:39 [PATCH for-8.0] block/export: Fix graph locking in blk_get_geometry() call Kevin Wolf
2023-03-27 12:06 ` Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito
2023-03-27 13:18 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCGXqY5B1GGqvabS@redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=eesposit@redhat.com \
--cc=hreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=ldoktor@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.