From: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org,
andersson@kernel.org, konrad.dybcio@linaro.org,
bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
quic_krichai@quicinc.com, johan+linaro@kernel.org,
steev@kali.org, mka@chromium.org, Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] PCI: qcom: Add support for system suspend and resume
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 11:56:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZCQLWzqKPrusMro+@hovoldconsulting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230327133824.29136-2-manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
On Mon, Mar 27, 2023 at 07:08:24PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> During the system suspend, vote for minimal interconnect bandwidth and
> also turn OFF the resources like clock and PHY if there are no active
> devices connected to the controller. For the controllers with active
> devices, the resources are kept ON as removing the resources will
> trigger access violation during the late end of suspend cycle as kernel
> tries to access the config space of PCIe devices to mask the MSIs.
>
> Also, it is not desirable to put the link into L2/L3 state as that
> implies VDD supply will be removed and the devices may go into powerdown
> state. This will affect the lifetime of storage devices like NVMe.
>
> And finally, during resume, turn ON the resources if the controller was
> truly suspended (resources OFF) and update the interconnect bandwidth
> based on PCIe Gen speed.
>
> Suggested-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>
> Acked-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index a232b04af048..f33df536d9be 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ struct qcom_pcie {
> struct gpio_desc *reset;
> struct icc_path *icc_mem;
> const struct qcom_pcie_cfg *cfg;
> + bool suspended;
> };
>
> #define to_qcom_pcie(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> @@ -1820,6 +1821,62 @@ static int qcom_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static int qcom_pcie_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct qcom_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * Set minimum bandwidth required to keep data path functional during
> + * suspend.
> + */
> + ret = icc_set_bw(pcie->icc_mem, 0, MBps_to_icc(250));
This isn't really the minimum bandwidth you're setting here.
I think you said off list that you didn't see real impact reducing the
bandwidth, but have you tried requesting the real minimum which would be
kBps_to_icc(1)?
Doing so works fine here with both the CRD and X13s and may result in
some further power savings.
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set interconnect bandwidth: %d\n", ret);
> + return ret;
> + }
Johan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-29 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-27 13:38 [PATCH v3 0/1] PCI: qcom: Add support for system suspend and resume Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-27 13:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-27 15:29 ` [EXT] " Frank Li
2023-03-29 13:02 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-29 13:04 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-03-29 14:51 ` Frank Li
2023-03-29 9:56 ` Johan Hovold [this message]
2023-03-29 12:52 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-29 12:59 ` Konrad Dybcio
2023-03-29 13:19 ` Johan Hovold
2023-03-29 14:01 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2023-03-29 14:42 ` Johan Hovold
2023-03-29 16:37 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZCQLWzqKPrusMro+@hovoldconsulting.com \
--to=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=d-gole@ti.com \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@linaro.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=mka@chromium.org \
--cc=quic_krichai@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=steev@kali.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.